From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suravee Suthikulanit Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 V3] perf/x86/amd: IOMMU Performance Counter Support Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 08:29:47 -0500 Message-ID: <519B76CB.1000208@amd.com> References: <1368819813-6481-1-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> <519A4429.30405@amd.com> <20130521091157.GD26912@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130521091157.GD26912-ndre7Fmf5hadTX5a5knrm8zTDFooKrT+cvkQGrU6aU0@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On 5/21/2013 4:11 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:41:29AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote: >> Peter, >> >> Please let me know if you have any questions/concerns regarding the PMU >> implementation. > Looks good, how would you like to go about merging this? Should I push > it through Ingo's tree or do you prefer it goes through some IOMMU tree? > Thank you, Peter. Since this is mostly PERF-related feature, I think it would be appropriate to push this through Ingo's tree. Suravee From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754472Ab3EUN3w (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 May 2013 09:29:52 -0400 Received: from ch1ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com ([216.32.181.183]:16982 "EHLO ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753196Ab3EUN3v (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 May 2013 09:29:51 -0400 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:163.181.249.109;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:ausb3twp02.amd.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -4 X-BigFish: VPS-4(zzbb2dI98dI9371I1432Izz1f42h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzzz2dh668h839h947hd25he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h1765h18e1h190ch1946h19b4h19c3h1ad9h1b0ah1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1155h) X-WSS-ID: 0MN5HHK-02-99F-02 X-M-MSG: Message-ID: <519B76CB.1000208@amd.com> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 08:29:47 -0500 From: Suravee Suthikulanit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Zijlstra CC: , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 V3] perf/x86/amd: IOMMU Performance Counter Support References: <1368819813-6481-1-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> <519A4429.30405@amd.com> <20130521091157.GD26912@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> In-Reply-To: <20130521091157.GD26912@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginatorOrg: amd.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/21/2013 4:11 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:41:29AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote: >> Peter, >> >> Please let me know if you have any questions/concerns regarding the PMU >> implementation. > Looks good, how would you like to go about merging this? Should I push > it through Ingo's tree or do you prefer it goes through some IOMMU tree? > Thank you, Peter. Since this is mostly PERF-related feature, I think it would be appropriate to push this through Ingo's tree. Suravee