From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net-next 2/2] xen-netfront: split event channels feature support Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 14:39:01 +0100 Message-ID: <519B78F5.5020301@citrix.com> References: <1369090931-27306-1-git-send-email-wei.liu2@citrix.com> <1369090931-27306-3-git-send-email-wei.liu2@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , , To: Wei Liu Return-path: Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]:3628 "EHLO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752872Ab3EUNjE (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 May 2013 09:39:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1369090931-27306-3-git-send-email-wei.liu2@citrix.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 21/05/13 00:02, Wei Liu wrote: > This patch adds a new feature called feature-split-event-channels for > netfront, enabling it to handle TX and RX events separately. > > If netback does not support this feature, it falls back to use single event > channel. [...] > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c > @@ -1503,12 +1528,90 @@ static int xen_net_read_mac(struct xenbus_device *dev, u8 mac[]) > return 0; > } > > +static int setup_netfront_single(struct netfront_info *info) > +{ > + int err; > + > + err = xenbus_alloc_evtchn(info->xbdev, &info->tx_evtchn); > + if (err < 0) > + goto fail; > + > + err = bind_evtchn_to_irqhandler(info->tx_evtchn, > + xennet_interrupt, > + 0, info->netdev->name, info); > + if (err < 0) > + goto bind_fail; > + info->rx_evtchn = info->tx_evtchn; > + info->rx_irq = info->tx_irq = err; > + dev_info(&info->xbdev->dev, > + "single event channel, evtchn = %d, irq = %d\n", > + info->tx_evtchn, info->tx_irq); This message is pointless chatter as the information is available elsewhere. Please remove. > + dev_info(&info->xbdev->dev, > + "split event channels, tx_evtchn/irq = %d/%d, rx_evtchn/irq = %d/%d", > + info->tx_evtchn, info->tx_irq, > + info->rx_evtchn, info->rx_irq); Similarly. Otherwise, Reviewed-by: David Vrabel David