From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, nschichan@freebox.fr
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next tree
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 09:48:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <519C785B.6070104@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130522.001909.837849096281513655.davem@davemloft.net>
On 05/22/2013 09:19 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 00:14:58 -0700
>
>> On Wed, 22 May 2013 00:07:48 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>>> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 13:04:38 -0700
>>>
>>>> Nicolas, I think the patches need a re-check so I'll drop the versions
>>>> which I presently have. Please refresh, retest and resend when
>>>> convenient? It'll need to be against linux-next, which is where the
>>>> conflicting (vfree/module_free) changes have occurred.
>>>
>>> How about working against net-next and submitting your patches to netdev
>>> just like the rest of the world?
>>
>> Well that's probably practical. But the patchset is a seccomp
>> enhancement for (at present) ARM. Not exactly net stuff, or anything
>> which netdev readers are likely to spend a lot of time testing and
>> reviewing.
>
> The seccomp BPF bits we reviewed and were interested in completely, because
> we're going to have to support JIT'ing all of that stuff on every cpu and
> we're interested how it fits into the existing BPF codes and infrastructure.
+1
seccomp is wired with BPF (JITs in arch/*/net/ + net/core/filter.c) and that's
part of networking, so they should go through netdev. This makes it also way
easier for review.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-22 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-21 4:29 linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next tree Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-21 4:29 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-21 20:04 ` Andrew Morton
2013-05-21 20:04 ` Andrew Morton
2013-05-22 7:07 ` David Miller
2013-05-22 7:14 ` Andrew Morton
2013-05-22 7:19 ` David Miller
2013-05-22 7:48 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-06-02 9:30 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-02 9:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-03 10:49 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-16 4:51 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-20 5:10 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-07 5:23 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-07 8:40 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2017-02-07 9:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-14 7:39 Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-14 7:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-14 7:38 Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-14 7:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-23 8:18 Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-23 8:18 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-06 9:00 Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-06 9:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-06 8:55 Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-06 8:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-21 4:32 Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-21 4:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-21 4:25 Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-21 4:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-21 7:44 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-05-21 23:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-22 9:20 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-05-20 4:14 Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-20 4:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-20 4:11 Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-20 4:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-20 6:02 Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-20 6:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-20 6:43 ` Cong Wang
2013-02-15 6:56 Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-15 6:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-08 3:56 Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-08 3:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-23 3:27 Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-23 3:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-23 3:40 ` Neil Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=519C785B.6070104@redhat.com \
--to=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nschichan@freebox.fr \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.