From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk>
Cc: Guillaume Ballet <gballetwork@gmail.com>, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why is only one int returned in iio_read_channel_processed?
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 10:19:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <519C7F93.9010606@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <519C7C29.9040707@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk>
On 05/22/2013 10:04 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 22/05/13 08:49, Guillaume Ballet wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The read_raw operation in iio_info has a signature that takes two
>> integer as in/out parameters. This lets the driver return values with
>> micro- or nano-unit precision.
>>
>> However, the high-level iio_read_channel_raw and
>> iio_read_channel_processed
> Do we even have an iio_read_channel_processed? I think you are referring
> to the in kernel consumer interface. In iio/consumer.h we have an
> iio_read_channel_raw but unless I am going mad no iio_read_channel_processed
> (as of yet).
>
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git/tree/include/linux/iio/consumer.h?h=togreg
>
> (is the latest development tree).
>
> Which tree are you looking at?
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/linux/iio/consumer.h#n145
>
>> functions' signature only has one integer
>> in/out parameter. That makes sense in the context of _raw because the
>> value isn't yet processed.
>>
>> However, as the scale is a number encoded over two ints, the
>> _processed value should also span two ints. Is there a reason why it's
>> still only one int?
> No it certainly should not be one int for exactly the reasons you have stated.
>>
I'm not to sure about that. I'd rather add a scale parameter to the
iio_read_channel_processed, just in the same way the
convert_raw_to_processed function takes a scale parameter.
- Lars
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-22 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-22 7:49 Why is only one int returned in iio_read_channel_processed? Guillaume Ballet
2013-05-22 8:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-05-22 8:19 ` Lars-Peter Clausen [this message]
2013-05-22 9:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-05-22 9:37 ` Guillaume Ballet
2013-05-22 11:43 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2013-05-22 13:29 ` Guillaume Ballet
2013-05-22 13:39 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2013-05-22 14:00 ` Guillaume Ballet
2013-05-22 14:15 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2013-05-22 15:24 ` Guillaume Ballet
2013-05-22 17:14 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2013-05-23 9:52 ` Guillaume Ballet
2013-05-23 10:39 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2013-05-23 13:18 ` Guillaume Ballet
2013-05-23 13:28 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2013-06-02 16:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=519C7F93.9010606@metafoo.de \
--to=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=gballetwork@gmail.com \
--cc=jic23@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.