All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	Xen-devel List <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: Xen-unstable 32bit build broken on 64bit systems with multiarch
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 11:10:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <519DEB16.7080706@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1369303267.17830.25.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>

On 23/05/13 11:01, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 10:39 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Trying to build 32bit tools on a 64bit multiarch system (Debian Wheezy
>> in my case) fails.
> I'm not sure that multiarch is actually quite ready for cross building
> in the "biarch" -m32 manner, I think til now they have mostly
> concentrated on being able to cross install runtime packages and proper
> cross building (i.e. with $triplet-gcc not gcc -m32).
>
> This is all based on vague observations on e.g. Debian devel and not
> something I'm 100% sure on.
>
>> $ make XEN_TARGET_ARCH=x86_32 -j4
> [...]
>> I suspect that the issue is the lack of an -m32 for
>>
>> gcc    -Wl,-soname -Wl,libxenctrl.so.4.0 -shared -o libxenctrl.so.4.0.0
>> xc_core.opic xc_core_x86.opic xc_cpupool.opic xc_domain.opic
>> xc_evtchn.opic xc_gnttab.opic xc_misc.opic xc_flask.opic xc_physdev.opic
>> xc_private.opic xc_sedf.opic xc_csched.opic xc_csched2.opic
>> xc_arinc653.opic xc_tbuf.opic xc_pm.opic xc_cpu_hotplug.opic
>> xc_resume.opic xc_tmem.opic xc_mem_event.opic xc_mem_paging.opic
>> xc_mem_access.opic xc_memshr.opic xc_hcall_buf.opic
>> xc_foreign_memory.opic xtl_core.opic xtl_logger_stdio.opic
>> xc_pagetab.opic xc_linux.opic xc_linux_osdep.opic -ldl -lpthread
>>
>> I have tried a few ideas but not managed to get a successful build. 
>> Does anyone with more knowledge in this area have any suggestions?
> What happens if you add the -m32? Do the error messages differ?
>
> Ian.
>

With -m32, I fail to link against -lbz2 and -lz.  I thought I had
installed both variants of these libraries but I am now not so sure.

~Andrew

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-23 10:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-23  9:39 Xen-unstable 32bit build broken on 64bit systems with multiarch Andrew Cooper
2013-05-23 10:01 ` Ian Campbell
2013-05-23 10:10   ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2013-05-23 10:23     ` Ian Campbell
2013-05-23 10:27       ` Andrew Cooper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=519DEB16.7080706@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.