All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Stanislav Meduna <stano@meduna.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Hai Huang <hhuang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix up a spurious page fault whenever it happens
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 08:06:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <519E3089.8040701@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1369315769.6828.198.camel@gandalf.local.home>

On 05/23/2013 06:29 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 08:19 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> 
>> We can add a bit in the architecture bits that
>> we use to check against other CPU and system
>> errata, and conditionally flush the whole TLB
>> from __native_flush_tlb_single().
> 
> If we find that some CPUs have issues and others do not, and we can
> determine this by checking the CPU type at run time, I would strongly
> suggest using the jump_label infrastructure to do the branches. I know
> this is early to suggest something like this, but I just wanted to put
> it in your head ;-)
> 

We don't even need the jump_label infrastructure -- we have
static_cpu_has*() which actually predates jump_label although it uses
the same underlying ideas.

	-hpa

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-23 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-17  8:42 [PATCH - sort of] x86: Livelock in handle_pte_fault Stanislav Meduna
2013-05-22  0:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-05-22  7:32   ` Stanislav Meduna
2013-05-22 12:33   ` Rik van Riel
2013-05-22 15:01     ` Linus Torvalds
2013-05-22 17:41       ` [PATCH] mm: fix up a spurious page fault whenever it happens Rik van Riel
2013-05-22 18:04         ` Stanislav Meduna
2013-05-22 18:11           ` Steven Rostedt
2013-05-22 18:21             ` Stanislav Meduna
2013-05-22 18:35               ` Rik van Riel
2013-05-22 18:42                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-05-22 18:43                   ` Rik van Riel
2013-05-23  8:07                     ` Stanislav Meduna
2013-05-23 12:19                       ` Rik van Riel
2013-05-23 13:29                         ` Steven Rostedt
2013-05-23 15:06                           ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2013-05-23 15:27                             ` Steven Rostedt
2013-05-23 17:24                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-05-23 17:36                                 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-05-23 17:38                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-05-24  8:29                         ` Stanislav Meduna
2013-05-24 10:28                           ` Stanislav Meduna
2013-05-24 13:06                           ` Rik van Riel
2013-05-24 13:55                             ` Stanislav Meduna
2013-05-24 14:23                               ` Stanislav Meduna
2013-06-16 21:34                             ` Stanislav Meduna
2013-06-18 19:13                               ` Stanislav Meduna
2013-06-19  5:20                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-06-19  7:36                                   ` Stanislav Meduna
2013-06-19  8:06                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-20 17:50                                       ` Stanislav Meduna
2013-05-23 14:45                       ` Linus Torvalds
2013-05-23 14:50                         ` Linus Torvalds
2013-05-23 15:03                           ` Stanislav Meduna
2013-05-22 18:47                 ` Stanislav Meduna

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=519E3089.8040701@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=hhuang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=stano@meduna.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.