From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44623) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ufpm0-0002zc-Jo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 07:03:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ufplv-0003sL-Fx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 07:03:00 -0400 Received: from david.siemens.de ([192.35.17.14]:19824) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ufplv-0003oS-5O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 07:02:55 -0400 Message-ID: <519F48D7.6080000@siemens.com> Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 13:02:47 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1369133851-1894-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1369133851-1894-16-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <519F050C.7020903@web.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 15/30] memory: add address_space_valid List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, David Gibson On 2013-05-24 12:50, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 24 May 2013 07:13, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> I'll also have a use for it: replace isa_is_ioport_assigned. > > That seems like it's something different: it's asking > "has some other bit of QEMU registered a handler for > this ioport?", not "at this moment in time if I make > an I/O access will it succeed?" (which in principle > should actually go all the way through and call a > registered ioport handler which might then say "no, > for this specific access we will fail"). Hmm... Paolo suggested to use it. But given the current arguments I guess it's better to stick with memory_region_find for that purpose. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux