From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from gateway08.websitewelcome.com ([67.18.53.17]:49356 "EHLO gateway08.websitewelcome.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934660Ab3E1Q3t (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2013 12:29:49 -0400 Received: from gator886.hostgator.com (gator886.hostgator.com [174.120.40.226]) by gateway08.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488D950B625FF for ; Tue, 28 May 2013 11:05:53 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <51A4D5E0.9010804@sensoray.com> Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 09:05:52 -0700 From: Pete Eberlein MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hans Verkuil CC: Ben Hutchings , David Woodhouse , linux-media Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] go7007 firmware updates References: <201305231025.31812.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> <1369671872.3469.383.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> <201305272156.18975.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <201305272156.18975.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Hans, On 05/27/2013 12:56 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > I can revert the rename action, but I would rather not do it. I > believe there are good reasons for doing this, especially since the > current situation is effectively broken anyway due to the missing > firmware files. > > If you really don't want to rename the two S2250 files, then I'll > make a patch reverting those to the original filename. > > Pete, if you have an opinion regarding this, please let us know. > After all, it concerns a Sensoray device. I am okay with the change of the firmware filenames. I've changed them myself several times in the past before it got into kernel staging. > Regards, > > Hans > Regards, Pete