From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754371Ab3E1TJS (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2013 15:09:18 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45]:40231 "EHLO mail-pb0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753837Ab3E1TJR (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2013 15:09:17 -0400 Message-ID: <51A500DA.9000708@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 12:09:14 -0700 From: John Stultz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk CC: David Vrabel , Jan Beulich , Thomas Gleixner , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] timekeeping: sync persistent clock and RTC on system time step changes References: <1368467768-2316-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com> <1368467768-2316-3-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com> <5191880F.3030308@linaro.org> <5192082D.4020400@citrix.com> <5192711B.1070607@linaro.org> <5193606502000078000D64E2@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <5193CFA2.8010008@linaro.org> <51A4F6C6.8080808@citrix.com> <20130528183137.GA23213@phenom.dumpdata.com> In-Reply-To: <20130528183137.GA23213@phenom.dumpdata.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/28/2013 11:31 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:26:14PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote: >> On 15/05/13 19:10, John Stultz wrote: >>> Ok, so really, as soon as the Dom0 time is set by NTP, all guests will >>> see the right time? That makes more sense, and means the window for >>> these sorts of issues is reasonably quite small. >> It's a small window but it's occurring in our automated test system. >> >>> David: So I'm less inclined to merge this individual change, but if you >>> still feel strongly about it, let me know and we can circle around on it >>> after you've addressed the specific issues I pointed out earlier. >> This patch was the actual bug fix but I've reworked it to use the >> pvclock_gtod notifier chain as this seemed to be what KVM hosts were >> using to maintain a clock for guests. Please review the new series, thanks. > Looks good. > > John if you are OK I am thinking to push this to Linus shortly as it is > fixing a bug. I'm really not sure I'd call this a bug. That seems like an over-reaction to a misconfigured system. Or if there is a bug, I'm not sure its been clearly explained. thanks -john