From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36035) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UhgjX-0006vJ-PA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 09:48:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UhgjR-0005p6-ON for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 09:48:07 -0400 Received: from mail-2.de-punkt.de ([2a00:12c0:1:64::5dbe:40ee]:33327) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UhgjR-0005oq-BO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 09:48:01 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail-2.de-punkt.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D0A13A345 for ; Wed, 29 May 2013 15:48:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-2.de-punkt.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail-10.de-punkt.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gE3P82PRhp7f for ; Wed, 29 May 2013 15:48:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.152] (p4FD071D2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.208.113.210]) (Authenticated sender: oliver.francke@filoo.de) by mail-2.de-punkt.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24DF03A336 for ; Wed, 29 May 2013 15:48:00 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <51A6070F.2010905@filoo.de> Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 15:47:59 +0200 From: Oliver Francke MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <519F1AED.80005@filoo.de> <51A5ECD8.5070303@filoo.de> In-Reply-To: <51A5ECD8.5070303@filoo.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-1.5.0 savevm error -95 while writing vm with ceph-rbd as storage-backend List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Could it be... On 05/29/2013 01:56 PM, Oliver Francke wrote: > Hi, > > is anybody willing to help me dig into this one? that there was a generic error ( -95) before the savevm-operation, that=20 just got not cleared? If I ignore just the error -95 in "savevm.c -> do_savevm" then the=20 snapshot is right there. Oliver. > Filed a bug-report, too: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1185395 > > King regards, > > Oliver. > > On 05/24/2013 09:46 AM, Oliver Francke wrote: >> Hi, >> >> with a running VM I encounter this strange behaviour, former=20 >> qemu-versions don't show up such an error. >> Perhaps this comes from the rbd-backend in qemu-1.5.0 in combination=20 >> with ceph-0.56.6? Therefore my >> crosspost. >> >> Even if I have no real live-snapshot avail - they know of this=20 >> restriction -, it's more work for the customers >> to perform a shutdown before the wonna do some changes to their VM ;) >> >> Any hints welcome, >> >> Oliver. >> > > --=20 Oliver Francke filoo GmbH Moltkestra=DFe 25a 33330 G=FCtersloh HRB4355 AG G=FCtersloh Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer: S.Grewing | J.Rehp=F6hler | C.Kunz Folgen Sie uns auf Twitter: http://twitter.com/filoogmbh