From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Cousson, Benoit" Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 3/3] arm: dts: add bandgap entry for OMAP4460 devices Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 16:19:42 +0200 Message-ID: <51A60E7E.2070905@ti.com> References: <1368629928-6723-1-git-send-email-eduardo.valentin@ti.com> <1368629928-6723-4-git-send-email-eduardo.valentin@ti.com> <5193A875.1020000@ti.com> <5193B9AA.7020507@ti.com> <519488D3.5070003@ti.com> <5194D0AF.3010407@ti.com> <51A60C74.4010307@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51A60C74.4010307@ti.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Eduardo Valentin Cc: tony@atomide.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Hi Eduardo, On 5/29/2013 4:11 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > Salut Monsieur Benoit, > > On 16-05-2013 08:27, Eduardo Valentin wrote: >> On 16-05-2013 03:20, Benoit Cousson wrote: >>> Hi Eduardo, >>> > > > >>> We need to check. >> >> Yeah, I also dont think this will work, because we will reparent the >> interrupt, setting to a different controller. That will break the TALERT >> signal already defined at GIC (check original patch). >> >> I propose keeping the way I sent. Unless there is a way to set two >> different controllers to same device. >> > > Any idea on this patch? Shall we keep the way it is? Well since we cannot use directly interrupt, I think we need to use at least the proper gpio binding. Thanks, Benoit From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: b-cousson@ti.com (Cousson, Benoit) Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 16:19:42 +0200 Subject: [PATCHv2 3/3] arm: dts: add bandgap entry for OMAP4460 devices In-Reply-To: <51A60C74.4010307@ti.com> References: <1368629928-6723-1-git-send-email-eduardo.valentin@ti.com> <1368629928-6723-4-git-send-email-eduardo.valentin@ti.com> <5193A875.1020000@ti.com> <5193B9AA.7020507@ti.com> <519488D3.5070003@ti.com> <5194D0AF.3010407@ti.com> <51A60C74.4010307@ti.com> Message-ID: <51A60E7E.2070905@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Eduardo, On 5/29/2013 4:11 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > Salut Monsieur Benoit, > > On 16-05-2013 08:27, Eduardo Valentin wrote: >> On 16-05-2013 03:20, Benoit Cousson wrote: >>> Hi Eduardo, >>> > > > >>> We need to check. >> >> Yeah, I also dont think this will work, because we will reparent the >> interrupt, setting to a different controller. That will break the TALERT >> signal already defined at GIC (check original patch). >> >> I propose keeping the way I sent. Unless there is a way to set two >> different controllers to same device. >> > > Any idea on this patch? Shall we keep the way it is? Well since we cannot use directly interrupt, I think we need to use at least the proper gpio binding. Thanks, Benoit From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966384Ab3E2Oxz (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2013 10:53:55 -0400 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:46878 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966245Ab3E2Oxy (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2013 10:53:54 -0400 Message-ID: <51A60E7E.2070905@ti.com> Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 16:19:42 +0200 From: "Cousson, Benoit" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eduardo Valentin CC: , , Russell King , , , Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 3/3] arm: dts: add bandgap entry for OMAP4460 devices References: <1368629928-6723-1-git-send-email-eduardo.valentin@ti.com> <1368629928-6723-4-git-send-email-eduardo.valentin@ti.com> <5193A875.1020000@ti.com> <5193B9AA.7020507@ti.com> <519488D3.5070003@ti.com> <5194D0AF.3010407@ti.com> <51A60C74.4010307@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <51A60C74.4010307@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Eduardo, On 5/29/2013 4:11 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > Salut Monsieur Benoit, > > On 16-05-2013 08:27, Eduardo Valentin wrote: >> On 16-05-2013 03:20, Benoit Cousson wrote: >>> Hi Eduardo, >>> > > > >>> We need to check. >> >> Yeah, I also dont think this will work, because we will reparent the >> interrupt, setting to a different controller. That will break the TALERT >> signal already defined at GIC (check original patch). >> >> I propose keeping the way I sent. Unless there is a way to set two >> different controllers to same device. >> > > Any idea on this patch? Shall we keep the way it is? Well since we cannot use directly interrupt, I think we need to use at least the proper gpio binding. Thanks, Benoit