From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ramsay Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2] path: Fix a sparse warning Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 00:57:56 +0100 Message-ID: <51A69604.20500@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> References: <51A3B308.6000201@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> <7vhahn2fz2.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <51A606A0.5060101@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Junio C Hamano , GIT Mailing-list To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Torsten_B=F6gershausen?= X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 30 01:59:28 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UhqH9-0000Ap-BI for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 30 May 2013 01:59:27 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S967270Ab3E2X7Z convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2013 19:59:25 -0400 Received: from mdfmta009.mxout.tbr.inty.net ([91.221.168.50]:41750 "EHLO smtp.demon.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S967257Ab3E2X7Y (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2013 19:59:24 -0400 Received: from mdfmta009.tbr.inty.net (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mdfmta009.tbr.inty.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1D6384081; Thu, 30 May 2013 00:59:23 +0100 (BST) Received: from mdfmta009.tbr.inty.net (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mdfmta009.tbr.inty.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9423C384080; Thu, 30 May 2013 00:59:22 +0100 (BST) Received: from [193.237.126.196] (unknown [193.237.126.196]) by mdfmta009.tbr.inty.net (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 May 2013 00:59:21 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 In-Reply-To: <51A606A0.5060101@web.de> X-MDF-HostID: 4 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Torsten B=F6gershausen wrote: > On 2013-05-28 19.04, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> Can you tell me what the conclusion on the discussion on your two >> other patches on 'pu'? >> >> * rj/mingw-cygwin (2013-05-08) 2 commits >> - cygwin: Remove the CYGWIN_V15_WIN32API build variable >> - mingw: rename WIN32 cpp macro to GIT_WINDOWS_NATIVE >> >> I stopped keeping track of the discussion and my vague recollection >> was that it is OK for 1.5 but not verified on 1.7 or something? >> >=20 > The tests I did under cygwin 1.7 did not show any regression. Thank you for testing this. ATB, Ramsay Jones