From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Egger Subject: Re: [PATCH] build: disable building kernel subsystem by default. Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 14:36:04 +0200 Message-ID: <51A747B4.4080200@amazon.de> References: <1368628571.11138.43.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk> <1369904954-13283-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> <20903.13935.476537.653586@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20903.13935.476537.653586@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: Ian Campbell , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , George Dunlap , xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Keir Fraser , Jan Beulich List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 30.05.13 13:22, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ian Campbell writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] build: disable building kernel subsystem by default."): >> This support is obsolete and harks back to the days of out of tree Linux >> kernel trees. > ... >> As well as George's release Ack this needs confirmation from Ian J that it >> isn't going to confuse the test system. > > This will break the test system's build of the ancient 2.6.18 kernels. > Everything else will be fine. How about I just drop those ? The purpose of my original patch was to prevent 2.6.18 kernel to be build on non-Linux platforms. Christoph > > We should probably retain buildconfigs/enable-xen-config and the > things it depends on. At the moment the test system uses that as part > of its arrangements for generating the kernel config - although > looking at what osstest does it does seem like the settings in > buildconfigs may be a bit out of date. > > Ian. >