From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-x22f.google.com (mail-wg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 769262C0089 for ; Fri, 31 May 2013 16:29:07 +1000 (EST) Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id e11so909766wgh.14 for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 23:29:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51A8432A.4000602@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 08:28:58 +0200 From: Sebastian Hesselbarth MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/13] net: mv643xx_eth DT support and fixes References: <1369154510-4927-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> <1369855975-21489-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> <20130530.175549.407800685811475192.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20130530.175549.407800685811475192.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: andrew@lunn.ch, jason@lakedaemon.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, buytenh@wantstofly.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 05/31/2013 02:55 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: Sebastian Hesselbarth > Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 21:32:42 +0200 > >> For the patches above I suggest to take Patches 1-6 through David >> Miller's branch, and Patches 7-12 through Jason Cooper's when the >> former have appeared on mainline linux. The patch set has been based >> on v3.10-rc3. > > Patches 1-6 applied to net-next, and patch #1 queued up for -stable. David, thanks for pulling these in. I finally found how to check if a patch already went into -stable. As Jason already said, the mdio patch that #1 fixes did not yet went into -stable. Can you unqueue it? Sorry for the confusion. Sebastian From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com (Sebastian Hesselbarth) Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 08:28:58 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v5 00/13] net: mv643xx_eth DT support and fixes In-Reply-To: <20130530.175549.407800685811475192.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1369154510-4927-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> <1369855975-21489-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> <20130530.175549.407800685811475192.davem@davemloft.net> Message-ID: <51A8432A.4000602@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 05/31/2013 02:55 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: Sebastian Hesselbarth > Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 21:32:42 +0200 > >> For the patches above I suggest to take Patches 1-6 through David >> Miller's branch, and Patches 7-12 through Jason Cooper's when the >> former have appeared on mainline linux. The patch set has been based >> on v3.10-rc3. > > Patches 1-6 applied to net-next, and patch #1 queued up for -stable. David, thanks for pulling these in. I finally found how to check if a patch already went into -stable. As Jason already said, the mdio patch that #1 fixes did not yet went into -stable. Can you unqueue it? Sorry for the confusion. Sebastian From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753088Ab3EaG3I (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 May 2013 02:29:08 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]:35119 "EHLO mail-wg0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751901Ab3EaG3E (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 May 2013 02:29:04 -0400 Message-ID: <51A8432A.4000602@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 08:28:58 +0200 From: Sebastian Hesselbarth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Miller CC: buytenh@wantstofly.org, jason@lakedaemon.net, andrew@lunn.ch, benh@kernel.crashing.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/13] net: mv643xx_eth DT support and fixes References: <1369154510-4927-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> <1369855975-21489-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> <20130530.175549.407800685811475192.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20130530.175549.407800685811475192.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/31/2013 02:55 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: Sebastian Hesselbarth > Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 21:32:42 +0200 > >> For the patches above I suggest to take Patches 1-6 through David >> Miller's branch, and Patches 7-12 through Jason Cooper's when the >> former have appeared on mainline linux. The patch set has been based >> on v3.10-rc3. > > Patches 1-6 applied to net-next, and patch #1 queued up for -stable. David, thanks for pulling these in. I finally found how to check if a patch already went into -stable. As Jason already said, the mdio patch that #1 fixes did not yet went into -stable. Can you unqueue it? Sorry for the confusion. Sebastian