From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Haigh Subject: Re: xen 4.3 test report (another bug) Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 00:02:36 +1000 Message-ID: <51A8AD7C.2040102@crc.id.au> References: <20130531092335.GA4917@zion.uk.xensource.com> <1369992620.5199.41.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <20130531100410.GB4917@zion.uk.xensource.com> <20130531105107.GL4394@zion.uk.xensource.com> <20130531115146.GM4394@zion.uk.xensource.com> <20130531131051.GN4394@zion.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130531131051.GN4394@zion.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 31/05/2013 11:10 PM, Wei Liu wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 04:15:31PM +0400, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote: >> 2013/5/31 Wei Liu : >>> Ah, this is a known issue. MAX_SKB_FRAGS in DomU is larger than the one >>> in Dom0, Dom0 thinks the packet is malicious and disconnect the vif. >>> Patches have been upstreamed to fix this, but the backporting to 3.8 is >>> not kicked off. >>> >>> If you don't bother applying patches and rebuilding your kernel, you can >>> probably want until the backport happens. >>> >>> If you cannot wait, look for email sent by Ian Campbell with title: >>> "xen-netback stable backports request (regression fixes)". >> >> >> Thanks, i'm try it. (i'm try to use 3.9.4) >> > > I think you need 3.10, but I'm not sure. Correct. I package 3.9.x for EL6 and I've had to patch it in manually as it doesn't exist in the vanilla kernel... -- Steven Haigh Email: netwiz@crc.id.au Web: https://www.crc.id.au Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897 Fax: (03) 8338 0299