From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Ferre Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 30 Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 10:45:15 +0200 Message-ID: <51AC579B.8040902@atmel.com> References: <20130530163334.105322d3c166b74165f1dad4@canb.auug.org.au> <20130603163633.e392dffdacc316b490b12a26@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eusmtp01.atmel.com ([212.144.249.243]:55244 "EHLO eusmtp01.atmel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751100Ab3FCIpW (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jun 2013 04:45:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130603163633.e392dffdacc316b490b12a26@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell , Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Linux-Next , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" On 03/06/2013 08:36, Stephen Rothwell : > Hi Geert, > > On Thu, 30 May 2013 10:07:48 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> >> The following defconfigs fail without anything useful in the log: >> - at91sam9g20_defconfig >> - at91sam9261_defconfig >> - at91sam9260_defconfig >> >> A manual run reveals why: >> Can't find default configuration "arch/arm/configs/at91sam9g20_defconfig"! >> >> This is due to the merge of several config files: >> >> commit b3f442b0eedbc20b5ce3f4a96530588d14901199 >> Author: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD >> Date: Wed May 15 17:19:21 2013 +0200 >> >> ARM: at91: udpate defconfigs >> >> Merge 9g20 with 9260 and 9g10 with 9261 as those SoCs can run from the same >> kernel even in non DT world. >> >> Fix the sam9261ek to allow 9g10 and sam9261 to compile together. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD >> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre > > Thanks for letting me know. I have stopped those three configs from > being built. Stephen, Geert, Thanks for having taking care about this. Is it possible for you to move the building to the replacement defconfigs: at91sam9260_9g20_defconfig at91sam9261_9g10_defconfig Best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre) Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 10:45:15 +0200 Subject: linux-next: Tree for May 30 In-Reply-To: <20130603163633.e392dffdacc316b490b12a26@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20130530163334.105322d3c166b74165f1dad4@canb.auug.org.au> <20130603163633.e392dffdacc316b490b12a26@canb.auug.org.au> Message-ID: <51AC579B.8040902@atmel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 03/06/2013 08:36, Stephen Rothwell : > Hi Geert, > > On Thu, 30 May 2013 10:07:48 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> >> The following defconfigs fail without anything useful in the log: >> - at91sam9g20_defconfig >> - at91sam9261_defconfig >> - at91sam9260_defconfig >> >> A manual run reveals why: >> Can't find default configuration "arch/arm/configs/at91sam9g20_defconfig"! >> >> This is due to the merge of several config files: >> >> commit b3f442b0eedbc20b5ce3f4a96530588d14901199 >> Author: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD >> Date: Wed May 15 17:19:21 2013 +0200 >> >> ARM: at91: udpate defconfigs >> >> Merge 9g20 with 9260 and 9g10 with 9261 as those SoCs can run from the same >> kernel even in non DT world. >> >> Fix the sam9261ek to allow 9g10 and sam9261 to compile together. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD >> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre > > Thanks for letting me know. I have stopped those three configs from > being built. Stephen, Geert, Thanks for having taking care about this. Is it possible for you to move the building to the replacement defconfigs: at91sam9260_9g20_defconfig at91sam9261_9g10_defconfig Best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre