From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from exprod5og118.obsmtp.com (exprod5og118.obsmtp.com [64.18.0.160]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F217260881 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 08:48:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cinmlip11.e2k.ad.ge.com ([165.156.4.1]) (using TLSv1) by exprod5ob118.postini.com ([64.18.4.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUaxYW02/43yDUxEgniFRd2m0xD1SJ5bb@postini.com; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 01:48:28 PDT Received: from unknown (HELO alpmlip01.e2k.ad.ge.com) ([3.159.17.48]) by cinmlip11.e2k.ad.ge.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 03 Jun 2013 04:48:26 -0400 Received: from selma.edi.geip.ge.com ([3.26.68.70]) by alpmlip01.e2k.ad.ge.com with ESMTP; 03 Jun 2013 04:48:26 -0400 Received: from [3.26.68.199] (fyvie.edi.geip.ge.com [3.26.68.199]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by selma.edi.geip.ge.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47667E04D5; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 09:48:25 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <51AC5859.70003@ge.com> Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 09:48:25 +0100 From: Martin Donnelly Organization: GE Intelligent Platforms User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Hatle References: <51A9294F.1090101@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <51A9294F.1090101@windriver.com> Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: gcc 4.8 - ICE X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 08:48:27 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 31/05/2013 23:50, Mark Hatle wrote: > > I suspect the ppce500v2 tuning hasn't been used much, but it appears to > trigger the failure case. > > Should I enter a bug for this issue in the YP bugzilla? I can also > attempt to file a bug w/ gnu this weekend or early next week. There is already one there https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4495 Cheers -Martin