From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Li Zefan Subject: Re: [PATCH cgroup/for-3.11 2/3] cgroup: mark "notify_on_release" and "release_agent" cgroup files insane Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 18:47:47 +0800 Message-ID: <51ADC5D3.5070108@huawei.com> References: <20130604021302.GH29989@mtj.dyndns.org> <20130604021355.GI29989@mtj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130604021355.GI29989-9pTldWuhBndy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, kay.sievers-tD+1rO4QERM@public.gmane.org, Michal Hocko , Vivek Goyal , lennart-mdGvqq1h2p+GdvJs77BJ7Q@public.gmane.org, Johannes Weiner , cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org On 2013/6/4 10:13, Tejun Heo wrote: > The empty cgroup notification mechanism currently implemented in > cgroup is tragically outdated. Forking and execing userland process > stopped being a viable notification mechanism more than a decade ago. > We're gonna have a saner mechanism. Let's make it clear that this > abomination is going away. > > Mark "notify_on_release" and "release_agent" with CFTYPE_INSANE. > Acked-by: Li Zefan Do you plan to implement the alternative mechanism for 3.11?