All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] cpufreq: Remove unused function __cpufreq_driver_getavg
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 18:06:04 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51AE025C.9030401@semaphore.gr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpomTRdHdKN3QUf0ba+gFXrEr=PbD4cJc8NSyNPmxfnUsMQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 06/04/2013 08:19 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 4 June 2013 01:18, Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> wrote:
>> Calculation of frequency target in ondemand governor changed and it is
>
> s/frequency target/target frequency

I will change it also in 3/3 that I use the same.

>> independent from measured average frequency.
>>
>> Remove unused__cpufreq_driver_getavg function and getavg member from
>> cpufreq_driver struct. Also, remove the callback getavg in
>> acpi_cpufreq_driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
>> ---
>>   drivers/cpufreq/Makefile       |  2 +-
>>   drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c |  5 -----
>>   drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c      | 12 ------------
>>   include/linux/cpufreq.h        |  6 ------
>>   4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
>> index 6ad0b91..aebd4ef 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
>> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0)    += cpufreq-cpu0.o
>>   # powernow-k8 can load then. ACPI is preferred to all other hardware-specific drivers.
>>   # speedstep-* is preferred over p4-clockmod.
>>
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ)         += acpi-cpufreq.o mperf.o
>
> Should this be done in 3/3 ?
>

acpi-cpufreq does not use mperf after 2/3. Why should we compile it with
CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ?
Do you want me to move the change in 3/3?

Thanks,
Stratos


  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-04 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-03 19:48 [PATCH v2 2/3] cpufreq: Remove unused function __cpufreq_driver_getavg Stratos Karafotis
2013-06-04  5:19 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-06-04 15:06   ` Stratos Karafotis [this message]
2013-06-05  8:42     ` Viresh Kumar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-06-05  9:35 Stratos Karafotis
2013-06-05  9:35 ` Stratos Karafotis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51AE025C.9030401@semaphore.gr \
    --to=stratosk@semaphore.gr \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.