From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53020) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uk99r-0007BC-46 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 04:33:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uk99l-0001S6-Cn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 04:33:27 -0400 Message-ID: <51AEF7C8.4060102@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 12:33:12 +0400 From: Michael Tokarev MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201305311848.r4VImTA0014518@d03av04.boulder.ibm.com> <51ADF2DF.7000306@suse.de> <87r4giuf7q.fsf@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <87r4giuf7q.fsf@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-stable] [PATCH stable-1.1] qga: set umask 0077 when daemonizing (CVE-2013-2007) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= , qemu-stable@nongnu.org 04.06.2013 18:23, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Andreas F=C3=A4rber writes: [] >> Do we have an active maintainer for 1.1 or 1.3? Unfortunately qemu.git >> MAINTAINERS has not been updated with stable branches and maintainers >> for some time. If not, I'd be willing to step up for security fixes at >> least. I tried maintaining 1.1 (and I continue maintaining it in debian, but the= re i'm not really interested in unrelated things), but after multiple promis= es to get the tree published @qemu.org I gave up. /mjt > Can you setup a tree and do a pull request, also with a patch to set > yourself up as maintainer? >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > Regards, >=20 > Anthony Liguori >=20 >=20 >=20 >> >> Regards, >> Andreas >> >> --=20 >> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany >> GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3= =BCrnberg >=20 >=20