From: "Gabriel Tolón" <gtolon@inti.gob.ar>
To: Antonio Quartulli <ordex@autistici.org>
Cc: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl bw performance
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 12:27:48 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51AF58F4.8080501@inti.gob.ar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51AF567A.7030404@inti.gob.ar>
Sorry, I sent the mail incomplete,
So these are the routes:
Equipo1:
root@Equipo 1:~# batctl o
[B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 5ffa8f2, MainIF/MAC: wlan0-1/66:70:02:4e:d9:42 (bat0)]
Originator last-seen (#/255) Nexthop [outgoingIF]:
Potential nexthops ...
E3-5GHz 0.680s (251) E3-5GHz [ wlan1-1]:
E3-5GHz (251)
E3-2GHz 0.430s (255) E3-5GHz [ wlan1-1]:
E3-5GHz (255) E3-2GHz (252)
Equipo3:
root@Equipo 3:~# batctl o
[B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 5ffa8f2, MainIF/MAC: wlan0-1/66:70:02:4e:d9:d6 (bat0)]
Originator last-seen (#/255) Nexthop [outgoingIF]:
Potential nexthops ...
E1-2GHz 0.310s (255) E1-5GHz [ wlan1-1]:
E1-5GHz (255) E1-2GHz (255)
E1-5GHz 0.550s (255) E1-5GHz [ wlan1-1]:
E1-5GHz (255)
The results of batctl pings:
Equipo1:
root@Equipo 1:~# batctl ping E3-2GHz
PING E3-2GHz (66:70:02:4e:d9:d6) 20(48) bytes of data
Reply from host E3-2GHz timed out
Reply from host E3-2GHz timed out
root@Equipo 1:~# batctl ping E3-5GHz
PING E3-5GHz (66:70:02:4e:d9:d7) 20(48) bytes of data
Reply from host E3-5GHz timed out
Reply from host E3-5GHz timed out
Equipo3:
root@Equipo 3:~# batctl ping E1-2GHz
PING E1-2GHz (66:70:02:4e:d9:42) 20(48) bytes of data
Reply from host E1-2GHz timed out
Reply from host E1-2GHz timed out
root@Equipo 3:~# batctl ping E1-5GHz
PING E1-5GHz (66:70:02:4e:d9:43) 20(48) bytes of data
Reply from host E1-5GHz timed out
Reply from host E1-5GHz timed out
If there is more info I could send you just tell me.
Regards
Gabriel
El 05/06/13 12:17, Gabriel Tolón escribió:
> Hi,
>
> Now I'm with batman-adv 5ffa8f201d085764365d202ace14675032cc3a74, batctl
> 6d3d4d1f80dca31b6400f3794772016cdbc19a73, and openwrt r36826.
>
> The results are almost the same, no batctl pings, and batctl bw much
> slower than iperfs. wdr3500 have 2 radios, these are the routes:
>
>
>
>
>
> El 04/06/13 02:38, Antonio Quartulli escribió:
>> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 07:13:26AM +0200, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 05:54:15PM -0300, Gabriel Tolón wrote:
>>>> So, in menuconfig I should select that id for batman-adv-devel right? I
>>>> wanted to see that commit on the git page using the search field but I
>>>> couldn't. By the way, how to know which batctl version use with each
>>>> batman-adv-devel commit? Sorry if all these questions are too basic,
>>>> but
>>>> I've tried to compile with this d672369 version and I got some errors,
>>>> so I'd like to understand if it was related to these things.
>>>
>>> no problems. These are not basic questions :) Actually the user
>>> usually do not
>>> enter these dev details and therefore it is normal to find issues.
>>>
>>> For batctl, you should use the last commit ID in this branch
>>> (ordex/bw_meter)
>>> http://git.open-mesh.org/batctl.git/shortlog/refs/heads/ordex/bw_meter
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> By the way, your iperf tests have been done on top of batman-adv?
>>>>> or directly on
>>>>> the wifi interface?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I got the results mentioned using interfaces managed by batman-adv.
>>>
>>> mh...maybe the pign is not working because of some changes brought by
>>> the
>>> bw_meter in the icmp packets. I'll check and I'll let you know.
>>
>> I juested the current ordex/bw_meter branches (batctl and batman-adv)
>> and the
>> ping works fine.
>>
>> Please, let me know your results.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-05 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <51A3C7E9.7080208@inti.gob.ar>
[not found] ` <20130528070057.GC3333@ritirata.org>
[not found] ` <51ACBCE4.8000506@inti.gob.ar>
2013-06-03 16:08 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl bw performance Antonio Quartulli
2013-06-03 20:54 ` Gabriel Tolón
2013-06-04 5:13 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-06-04 5:38 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-06-05 15:17 ` Gabriel Tolón
2013-06-05 15:27 ` Gabriel Tolón [this message]
2013-06-06 5:51 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-06-06 18:19 ` Gabriel Tolón
2013-06-06 18:29 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-06-06 19:04 ` Gabriel Tolón
2013-06-06 19:18 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-06-07 13:49 ` Gabriel Tolón
2013-06-07 13:57 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-06-07 14:38 ` Gabriel Tolón
2013-06-07 14:40 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-06-07 17:13 ` Gabriel Tolón
2013-06-07 17:27 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-06-07 18:39 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-06-07 18:57 ` Gabriel Tolón
2013-06-08 12:29 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-06-08 20:20 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-06-09 0:26 ` NicoEchániz
2013-06-10 13:12 ` Gabriel Tolón
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51AF58F4.8080501@inti.gob.ar \
--to=gtolon@inti.gob.ar \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
--cc=ordex@autistici.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.