From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-pci: new config layout: using memory BAR Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:07:18 -0700 Message-ID: <51AFC4A6.6070607@zytor.com> References: <20130530140132.GC21440@redhat.com> <874ndgujiw.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <20130603101136.GB8649@redhat.com> <87fvwytpa1.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <20130604064216.GD19433@redhat.com> <871u8g67d6.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <20130605140936.GB10604@redhat.com> <87ehcgr3wq.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <20130605151953.GA25987@redhat.com> <87bo7ktvaw.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <20130605162029.GB26561@redhat.com> <51AFA92B.2030203@zytor.com> <87fvwwmdmf.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <51AFB3DD.1050902@zytor.com> <874ndcb47i.fsf@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <874ndcb47i.fsf@codemonkey.ws> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Peter Maydell , kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Stefan Hajnoczi , Paolo Bonzini , KONRAD Frederic List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On 06/05/2013 03:08 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >> Definitely an option. However, we want to be able to boot from native >> devices, too, so having an I/O BAR (which would not be used by the OS >> driver) should still at the very least be an option. > > What makes it so difficult to work with an MMIO bar for PCI-e? > > With legacy PCI, tracking allocation of MMIO vs. PIO is pretty straight > forward. Is there something special about PCI-e here? > It's not tracking allocation. It is that accessing memory above 1 MiB is incredibly painful in the BIOS environment, which basically means MMIO is inaccessible. -hpa