From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tushar Behera Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Clock changes for supporting CPUFreq on Exynos5250 Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 14:32:18 +0530 Message-ID: <51B0501A.8070004@linaro.org> References: <1368770153-29041-1-git-send-email-tushar.behera@linaro.org> <51A442E4.90307@linaro.org> <20130529224203.6058.75266@quantum> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130529224203.6058.75266@quantum> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Turquette Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, thomas.abraham@linaro.org, patches@linaro.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org On 05/30/2013 04:12 AM, Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Tushar Behera (2013-05-27 22:38:44) >> On 05/17/2013 11:25 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: >>> With the use of common clock framework, CPUFreq driver on EXYNOS5250 now >>> requires a few changes in clocks. >>> >>> Tested on Exynos5250 based Arndale board. >>> The patches are based on v3.10-rc1. >>> >>> Tushar Behera (2): >>> clk: exynos5250: Update cpufreq related clocks for EXYNOS5250 >>> clk: exynos5250: Add sclk_mpll to the parent list of mout_cpu clock >>> >>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c | 8 ++++---- >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>> >> >> Any comments on this series? >> > > I've taken both patches into clk-next. > Would it be possible for you to queue them for 3.10-rc? These two patches are sufficient for cpufreq to work on Arndale board. It would be nice to have cpufreq working on 3.10 kernel. > Regards, > Mike > >> -- >> Tushar Behera -- Tushar Behera