From: Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>
To: Massimo Canonico <mex@di.unipmn.it>
Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: CAP and performance problem
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 15:02:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B08883.50003@ts.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51B08606.9090105@di.unipmn.it>
On 06.06.2013 14:52, Massimo Canonico wrote:
>
> On 06/06/2013 12:44 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On 06/06/13 11:39, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 06.06.2013 10:57, Massimo Canonico wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 06/06/2013 10:37 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>>>>> On mer, 2013-06-05 at 19:05 +0200, Massimo Canonico wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Dario,
>>>>>> and thanks for these test.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I forgot to ask you which xen version has beed used for your experiments.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, me too! :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm using xen-unstable, pulled yesterday (commit id
>>>>> e430510e5cbbfcdc1077739292def633e70fedea), compiled and installed on a
>>>>> Debian unstable system. Dom0 kernel is a bit old, as it's a 3.6.
>>>>>
>>>>> What about you?
>>>> xen 4.2.2
>>>> kernel dom0: 3.8.11-200.fc18.x86_64
>>>
>>> Just had an idea: is there any other load on the system during your test (other
>>> domains, dom0 load)? If not, it could be that the power management is reducing
>>> the cpu speed during idle (when the cap applies). This could lead to reduced
>>> performance overall.
>>>
>>> You can test this by setting the xen hypervisor boot option
>>>
>>> cpufreq=none
>>>
>>> and run your test again (with and without cap).
>>
>> Ah, genius Juergen! That would make total sense.
>>
>> -George
>>
> Unfortunately, this did not change much. I set "cpufreq=none" in the boot line
You added the boot parameter for the hypervisor, not dom0? And (please forgive
my paranoia) you rebooted the complete system after that?
> and restart my experiment.
> With no cap I got 298.029
> with cap=50% I got 910.272
> (average values of 3 experiments for each cap setting)
>
> dom0 load during the experiment is less than 1% (that says xentop)
What was the load reported by xentop for your domu?
Could you try:
xl vcpu-list; sleep 10; xl vcpu-list
when the test is running and post the output?
Juergen
--
Juergen Gross Principal Developer Operating Systems
PBG PDG ES&S SWE OS6 Telephone: +49 (0) 89 3222 2967
Fujitsu Technology Solutions e-mail: juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com
Domagkstr. 28 Internet: ts.fujitsu.com
D-80807 Muenchen Company details: ts.fujitsu.com/imprint.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-06 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-21 9:02 CAP and performance problem Massimo Canonico
2013-05-21 10:41 ` George Dunlap
2013-05-21 10:48 ` George Dunlap
2013-05-21 11:54 ` Massimo Canonico
2013-05-21 13:06 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-05-21 14:28 ` Massimo Canonico
2013-05-21 14:47 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-05-21 15:26 ` Massimo Canonico
2013-05-22 14:42 ` Massimo Canonico
2013-05-22 15:39 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-05-24 7:48 ` Massimo Canonico
2013-06-04 14:03 ` Massimo Canonico
2013-06-04 14:25 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-06-05 16:50 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-06-05 17:11 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-06-05 17:05 ` Massimo Canonico
2013-06-06 8:37 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-06-06 8:57 ` Massimo Canonico
2013-06-06 9:52 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-06-06 10:39 ` Juergen Gross
2013-06-06 10:44 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-06 12:52 ` Massimo Canonico
2013-06-06 12:58 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-06 13:02 ` Juergen Gross [this message]
2013-06-06 13:55 ` Massimo Canonico
2013-06-06 14:12 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-06 14:12 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-06-06 15:27 ` Massimo Canonico
2013-06-06 15:42 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-06-06 15:54 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-06-06 16:27 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-07 7:40 ` Massimo Canonico
2013-06-07 4:45 ` Juergen Gross
2013-06-06 13:03 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-06-06 13:09 ` Massimo Canonico
2013-06-06 9:02 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-06 9:48 ` Dario Faggioli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51B08883.50003@ts.fujitsu.com \
--to=juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=mex@di.unipmn.it \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.