All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "weiqi@kylinos.com.cn" <weiqi@kylinos.com.cn>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: "weiqi@kylinos.com.cn" <weiqi@kylinos.com.cn>,
	torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: race condition in schedule_on_each_cpu()
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 10:24:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B14472.60904@kylinos.com.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51B138AA.4070707@kylinos.com.cn>

In the previous  message,You mentioned:


>> by the way, I'm wondering about  what's the race condition before
which  doesn't exist now


> Before the commit you originally quoted, the calling thread could be
preempted and migrated to another CPU before get_online_cpus() thus
ending up executing the function twice on the new cpu but skipping the
old one.


does this situation will happen in "Full preemption" config, on 3.0.30-rt50?







于 2013年06月07日 09:34, weiqi@kylinos.com.cn 写道:
> it's preemption mode related ,
>
> on the 3.0.30-rt50, only   config kernel  with highest preemption 
> level (Fully Preemptible Kernel (RT)) in cpu preemption model
> will cause problem
>
> and even i use the "Preemptible Kernel" or "Preemptible Kernel 
> (Low-Latency Desktop)"  the problem would not happen..
>
>
> > I looked through the logs but the only worker depletion related 
> patches which pop up are around CPU hotplugs, so I don't think they 
> apply here. If the problem is relatively easy to reproduce && you 
> can't move onto a newer kernel, I'm afraid bisection probably is the 
> best option. Thanks!
>



  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-07  2:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <tencent_0777D84B54B4163A3B85255A@qq.com>
2013-06-06 21:23 ` race condition in schedule_on_each_cpu() Tejun Heo
2013-06-07  1:34   ` weiqi
2013-06-07  2:24     ` weiqi [this message]
2013-06-07 23:22       ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]         ` <51B27744.6090507@kylinos.com.cn>
2013-06-08 11:30           ` weiqi
     [not found] <51A7FFE8.6060204@kylinos.com.cn>
     [not found] ` <20130531023246.GD30479@mtj.dyndns.org>
     [not found]   ` <51A821F3.1000605@kylinos.com.cn>
2013-05-31  5:03     ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51B14472.60904@kylinos.com.cn \
    --to=weiqi@kylinos.com.cn \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.