From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tushar Behera Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Clock changes for supporting CPUFreq on Exynos5250 Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 09:27:13 +0530 Message-ID: <51B15A19.2020403@linaro.org> References: <1368770153-29041-1-git-send-email-tushar.behera@linaro.org> <51A442E4.90307@linaro.org> <20130529224203.6058.75266@quantum> <51B0501A.8070004@linaro.org> <20130606195156.10233.37021@quantum> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.220.42]:45835 "EHLO mail-pa0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752312Ab3FGD5W (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jun 2013 23:57:22 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id rl6so2244385pac.1 for ; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 20:57:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130606195156.10233.37021@quantum> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Turquette Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, thomas.abraham@linaro.org, patches@linaro.org >> Would it be possible for you to queue them for 3.10-rc? These two >> patches are sufficient for cpufreq to work on Arndale board. It would be >> nice to have cpufreq working on 3.10 kernel. >> > > I only want to take bug fixes into the -rc's. Did cpufreq work on > Arndale in v3.10? If it did then this is a regression and can be fixed. > If this is a new feature however I'll keep the patches in clk-next. > This fixes a regression as cpufreq was working for EXYNOS5250 based systems before migration to CCF. Though Arndale support was added during 3.10, this holds good for other EXYNOS5250 based systems. -- Tushar Behera