From: Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz>
To: linux--arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, dwmw2@infradead.org
Subject: NAND buffer allocation fails
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 21:03:26 +1200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B1A1DE.3020603@prisktech.co.nz> (raw)
Could someone explain why the following situation might occur:
In drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c, we have:
int nand_scan_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd)
{
int i;
struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
/* New bad blocks should be marked in OOB, flash-based BBT, or both */
BUG_ON((chip->bbt_options & NAND_BBT_NO_OOB_BBM) &&
!(chip->bbt_options & NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH));
if (!(chip->options & NAND_OWN_BUFFERS))
chip->buffers = kmalloc(sizeof(*chip->buffers), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!chip->buffers)
return -ENOMEM;
...
For some reason, the kmalloc always fails on my configuration/hardware
(arch-vt8500: WonderMedia/VIA APC8750).
The strange thing is that if I add the NAND_OWN_BUFFERS option, and
allocate my own buffers in the driver probe everything is fine.
Driver probe code below:
priv->nand.buffers = devm_kzalloc(priv->dev,
sizeof(*priv->nand.buffers), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!priv->nand.buffers) {
dev_err(priv->dev, "failed to allocate NAND buffers\n");
return -ENOMEM;
}
The devm_kzalloc does occur earlier than the nand_scan_tail alloc would
have, but there doesn't appear to be a shortage of memory on the
platform so I don't think it's failing for a memory shortage.
Is there any real difference between using kmalloc and devm_kzalloc to
allocate the buffer (other than the obvious 0'ing of the buffer)?
Why would one call fail and the other succeed?
Regards
Tony Prisk
next reply other threads:[~2013-06-07 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-07 9:03 Tony Prisk [this message]
2013-06-07 9:07 ` NAND buffer allocation fails Tony Prisk
2013-06-07 9:07 ` Tony Prisk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51B1A1DE.3020603@prisktech.co.nz \
--to=linux@prisktech.co.nz \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux--arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.