From: Zhao Hongjiang <zhaohongjiang@huawei.com>
To: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <hch@lst.de>
Subject: xfstests failure generic/239
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2013 11:13:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B2A15F.1060704@huawei.com> (raw)
Hi all,
I run xfstests #239 against mainline 3.10.0-rc3, unfortunately it failure in my QEMU. I run the
case a hundred times, it certainly hit the failure several times. The failure msg is as follow:
FSTYP -- ext4
PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 3.10.0-rc3-mainline
generic/239 1s ... - output mismatch (see /home/zhj/xfstests/results/generic/239.out.bad)
--- tests/generic/239.out 2013-06-07 22:04:09.000000000 -0400
+++ /home/zff/xfstests/results/generic/239.out.bad 2013-06-07 22:04:09.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,2 +1,515 @@
QA output created by 239
+hostname: Host name lookup failure
Silence is golden
+0: 0x0
+1: 0x0
+2: 0x0
+3: 0x0
...
I found that from 2.6.39 the test case occur this failure and it is is introduced by this
commit: 198868f35de99e7197829314076e5465c37e4cc5
ext4: Use single thread to perform DIO unwritten convertion
When i revert this patch, the failure seems go away. But when i see
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2010-06/msg00269.html, it said that
"This contains core direct I/O changes to allow the filesystem to delay AIO completion,
as well as a patch to fix XFS. ext4 also has the same issue, and from a quick look also
doesn't properly complete unwritten extent conversions for synchronous direct I/O, but
I'll leave that for someone more familar to figure out."
I also run the test against 3.4.24 rt-tree with revert the patch which i found before, but
the hundred times tests all failure.
So, things maybe not simple, i doubt the patch i found isn't the root cause.
Regards,
- Hongjiang
next reply other threads:[~2013-06-08 3:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-08 3:13 Zhao Hongjiang [this message]
2013-06-08 22:30 ` xfstests failure generic/239 Theodore Ts'o
2013-06-09 2:37 ` Zhao Hongjiang
2013-06-09 3:29 ` Zhao Hongjiang
2013-06-09 4:42 ` Zhao Hongjiang
2013-06-25 7:18 ` Zhao Hongjiang
2013-07-30 3:28 ` Zhao Hongjiang
2013-07-30 15:48 ` Jan Kara
2013-07-31 2:42 ` Zhao Hongjiang
2013-07-31 14:13 ` Jan Kara
2013-08-01 2:05 ` Zhao Hongjiang
2013-08-01 8:49 ` Jan Kara
2013-08-01 9:10 ` Jan Kara
2013-08-01 10:28 ` Zhao Hongjiang
2013-08-01 9:28 ` Zhao Hongjiang
2013-08-01 21:03 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51B2A15F.1060704@huawei.com \
--to=zhaohongjiang@huawei.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.