From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Kinzler Subject: Re: Xen 4.2.2 / fixed vanilla kernel 3.7.10 / GPLPV r956 passes my torture test Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:44:30 +0200 Message-ID: <51B5AE0E.9050301@hfp.de> References: <51B22679.6040907@hfp.de> <6035A0D088A63A46850C3988ED045A4B5C206CA4@BITCOM1.int.sbss.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <6035A0D088A63A46850C3988ED045A4B5C206CA4@BITCOM1.int.sbss.com.au> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: James Harper , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hello James, > Thanks for the feedback. If you feel like doing some more testing, the latest > commit includes a very experimental tmem driver that does write-through caching > on the pagefile. Sorry, I don't have time to test/validate experimental features. I think it would be great if you could introduce some "stable release concept" in GPLPV. I think most users (including me) will find it difficult to identify the latest stable release of GPLPV. My tests always try to validate (as far as this is possible at all) a stable Xen setup. Regards Andreas