From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1UmKeX-0007xD-QY for mharc-qemu-trivial@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 05:14:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51069) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UmKeU-0007tK-Fw for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 05:14:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UmKeT-00013G-F4 for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 05:14:06 -0400 Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([86.62.121.231]:38319) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UmKeM-00010n-SS; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 05:13:59 -0400 Received: from [192.168.88.2] (mjt.vpn.tls.msk.ru [192.168.177.99]) by isrv.corpit.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D9E411FC; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 13:13:56 +0400 (MSK) Message-ID: <51B6EA52.1060906@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 13:13:54 +0400 From: Michael Tokarev Organization: Telecom Service, JSC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Icedove/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Crosthwaite References: <1ec46fbd250efe78699a1e4cf6838c0c88f4acc7.1370572420.git.peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com> <51B26065.3000705@msgid.tls.msk.ru> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 OpenPGP: id=804465C5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 86.62.121.231 Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, edgar.iglesias@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 1/5] intc/xilinx_intc: Use qemu_set_irq X-BeenThere: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:14:08 -0000 11.06.2013 04:41, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: > On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> Thanks, applied to the trivial patches queue. > > I need to respin the later patches in this series but as you have > taken this ill drop it from the respin. No conflict issues. heh. I haven't even noticed this is 1/5 ;) Please don't send just some patches from a series for applying to other trees. Because if you do the respin, at least in some cases you'll have to wait for the applied bits to reach master first... ;) It's as trivial to remove this one from -trivial as to keep it there, it's your call ;) Thanks, /mjt