diff for duplicates of <51B81B95.4090406@huawei.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 7215874..7b94b6d 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ On 6/12/2013 8:45 AM, Mario Smarduch wrote: > > Hi Antonios, - thanks for your feedback, initially we?ll work with static binding + thanks for your feedback, initially we’ll work with static binding gain performance data given latency/throughput is key, later add dynamic binding (as well as re-optimize affinity code). And as you already know move towards VFIO, which is a longer term effort. @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ MJS> Agree naming could be better. MJS> This should save a costly IPI if for example Phys IRQ is taken on CPU 0 and target vCPU on CPU 1. I agree kvm_arch_vcpu_load() is a good place if you let vCPUs float. vigic_set_passthrough_affinity can be optimized more to eliminate -the free_irq(), requesnt_irq(). For now it?s a simple implementation we?re +the free_irq(), requesnt_irq(). For now it’s a simple implementation we’re assuming static binding, start gathering performance/latency data. Will change the name as you suggest. > diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 19b3b9f..0f3123e 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,10 +1,15 @@ "ref\051B6D52E.4030707@huawei.com\0" "ref\0CAG8rG2zzasO--3y2HsKXBUpof6DXqNkvqxN1VZGQR4Q8f=iuUw@mail.gmail.com\0" "ref\02DDB038789B01B4B80B0D3F1FF7CBDC2214E9024@lhreml509-mbb.china.huawei.com\0" - "From\0mario.smarduch@huawei.com (Mario Smarduch)\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH 2/2] add initial kvm dev passhtrough support\0" + "From\0Mario Smarduch <mario.smarduch@huawei.com>\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 2/2] add initial kvm dev passhtrough support\0" "Date\0Wed, 12 Jun 2013 08:56:21 +0200\0" - "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0Antonios Motakis <a.motakis@virtualopensystems.com>\0" + "Cc\0christoffer.dall@linaro.com <christoffer.dall@linaro.com>" + Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> + kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu> + linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> + " kvm@vger.kernel.org <kvm@vger.kernel.org>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Resending, initial email from my exchange client got rejected\n" @@ -14,7 +19,7 @@ "> \n" "> \n" "Hi Antonios, \n" - " thanks for your feedback, initially we?ll work with static binding\n" + " thanks for your feedback, initially we\342\200\231ll work with static binding\n" " gain performance data given latency/throughput is key, later add dynamic\n" " binding (as well as re-optimize affinity code). And as you already\n" " know move towards VFIO, which is a longer term effort.\n" @@ -103,7 +108,7 @@ "MJS> This should save a costly IPI if for example Phys IRQ is taken on CPU 0\n" "and target vCPU on CPU 1. I agree kvm_arch_vcpu_load() is a good place if you \n" "let vCPUs float. vigic_set_passthrough_affinity can be optimized more to eliminate \n" - "the free_irq(), requesnt_irq(). For now it?s a simple implementation we?re\n" + "the free_irq(), requesnt_irq(). For now it\342\200\231s a simple implementation we\342\200\231re\n" "assuming static binding, start gathering performance/latency data. \n" "Will change the name as you suggest.\n" "> \n" @@ -117,4 +122,4 @@ "> /www.virtualopensystems.com <http://www.virtualopensystems.com>\n" > -c0dcc7d6b42b4751838111d9ecd877bbac33a32c29b4d208dc55fbaabb310f19 +3aa93e91d4a0e82ba081c94caa49da377e5facc63d5352a3124a6edc058f8c02
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.