From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maarten Lankhorst Subject: Re: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: Changes to 'debian-experimental' Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 22:38:59 +0200 Message-ID: <51B8DC63.10504@gmail.com> References: <877ghzxmqz.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <877ghzxmqz.fsf-0+8NcsyEcYy4U5AIKzd8Wg@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nouveau-bounces+gcfxn-nouveau=m.gmane.org-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org Errors-To: nouveau-bounces+gcfxn-nouveau=m.gmane.org-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org To: Sven Joachim Cc: "nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org" , debian-x-0aAXYlwwYIJuHlm7Suoebg@public.gmane.org List-Id: nouveau.vger.kernel.org Hey, Op 12-06-13 19:27, Sven Joachim schreef: > Hi, > > it is currently not necessary to use the debian-experimental branch, > especially since there has been a newer version in unstable. > > On 2013-06-12 11:32 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >> .gitignore | 2 >> ChangeLog |16944 ----------------------------------------------- > FWIW, I don't agree with deleting this file - package contents now > depend on whether you're building from git or from a tarball, and > ChangeLog is also used by the 01-set-NV_DRIVER_DATE-from-ChangeLog.diff > patch. I don't see a point of keeping NV_DRIVER_DATE, it was useful in the 0.0.16 days where everything was just a git snapshot, but I now regularly do xf86-video-nouveau, so there's never a big delta between versions. Does anyone have any objections if I zap NV_DRIVER_DATE upstream? ~Maarten