From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42910) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UnMm5-0006rv-Go for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 01:42:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UnMm4-0005F2-K4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 01:42:13 -0400 Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([86.62.121.231]:33598) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UnMm4-0005Ei-C4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 01:42:12 -0400 Message-ID: <51BAAD30.4090806@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:42:08 +0400 From: Michael Tokarev MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <51B979E6.1030504@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <51BA3D45.8080105@comstyle.com> In-Reply-To: <51BA3D45.8080105@comstyle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] solaris x86 in qemu? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Brad Smith Cc: qemu-devel 14.06.2013 01:44, Brad Smith wrote: > On 13/06/13 3:51 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> I think that supporting solaris as _guest_ OS is an important goal >> for qemu/kvm (as opposed to _host_). > > IMO both are important goals. I don't think it would be that big of a deal to find one or two people to provide Solaris x64 10 and/or 11.1 buildslaves. Well, after discovering how long solaris guest is broken (since 1.0.50), I tend to disagree that it is important... ;) And this very fact that it's broken makes it more difficult to provide a build bot. I wanted to provide one, but I don't have spare hardware for that, so I intended to set up a virtual machine, but it does not work.. ;) Thanks, /mjt