All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] tracing/kprobes: Avoid perf_trace_buf_*() if ->perf_events is empty
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:41:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51BE857A.1080505@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130616172146.GA8533@redhat.com>

On 2013/6/17 1:21, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> perf_trace_buf_prepare() + perf_trace_buf_submit() make no sense
> if this task/CPU has no active counters. Change kprobe_perf_func()
> and kretprobe_perf_func() to check call->perf_events beforehand
> and return if this list is empty.
> 
> For example, "perf record -e some_probe -p1". Only /sbin/init will
> report, all other threads which hit the same probe will do
> perf_trace_buf_prepare/perf_trace_buf_submit just to realize that
> nobody wants perf_swevent_event().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>

Good point, I think we also need to change other places in below patch.

After applied the patch, perf_tp_event() function call reduced a lots
when using task based perf tracing.


-----------------------------------


tracing: Avoid perf_trace_buf_*() if ->perf_events is empty


Signed-off-by: zhangwei(Jovi) <jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>
---
 include/trace/ftrace.h        |    5 ++++-
 kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c |   10 ++++++++--
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/trace/ftrace.h b/include/trace/ftrace.h
index 19edd7f..5d340f5 100644
--- a/include/trace/ftrace.h
+++ b/include/trace/ftrace.h
@@ -659,6 +659,10 @@ perf_trace_##call(void *__data, proto)					\
 	int __data_size;						\
 	int rctx;							\
 									\
+	head = this_cpu_ptr(event_call->perf_events);			\
+	if (hlist_empty(head))						\
+		return;							\
+									\
 	perf_fetch_caller_regs(&__regs);				\
 									\
 	__data_size = ftrace_get_offsets_##call(&__data_offsets, args); \
@@ -679,7 +683,6 @@ perf_trace_##call(void *__data, proto)					\
 									\
 	{ assign; }							\
 									\
-	head = this_cpu_ptr(event_call->perf_events);			\
 	perf_trace_buf_submit(entry, __entry_size, rctx, __addr,	\
 		__count, &__regs, head, __task);			\
 }
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c b/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
index 8f2ac73..28debf4 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
@@ -553,6 +553,10 @@ static void perf_syscall_enter(void *ignore, struct pt_regs *regs, long id)
 	if (!sys_data)
 		return;

+	head = this_cpu_ptr(sys_data->enter_event->perf_events);
+	if (hlist_empty(head))
+		return;
+
 	/* get the size after alignment with the u32 buffer size field */
 	size = sizeof(unsigned long) * sys_data->nb_args + sizeof(*rec);
 	size = ALIGN(size + sizeof(u32), sizeof(u64));
@@ -571,7 +575,6 @@ static void perf_syscall_enter(void *ignore, struct pt_regs *regs, long id)
 	syscall_get_arguments(current, regs, 0, sys_data->nb_args,
 			       (unsigned long *)&rec->args);

-	head = this_cpu_ptr(sys_data->enter_event->perf_events);
 	perf_trace_buf_submit(rec, size, rctx, 0, 1, regs, head, NULL);
 }

@@ -629,6 +632,10 @@ static void perf_syscall_exit(void *ignore, struct pt_regs *regs, long ret)
 	if (!sys_data)
 		return;

+	head = this_cpu_ptr(sys_data->exit_event->perf_events);
+	if (hlist_empty(head))
+		return;
+
 	/* We can probably do that at build time */
 	size = ALIGN(sizeof(*rec) + sizeof(u32), sizeof(u64));
 	size -= sizeof(u32);
@@ -649,7 +656,6 @@ static void perf_syscall_exit(void *ignore, struct pt_regs *regs, long ret)
 	rec->nr = syscall_nr;
 	rec->ret = syscall_get_return_value(current, regs);

-	head = this_cpu_ptr(sys_data->exit_event->perf_events);
 	perf_trace_buf_submit(rec, size, rctx, 0, 1, regs, head, NULL);
 }

-- 
1.7.9.7




  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-17  3:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-16 17:21 [PATCH 0/3] tracing/kprobes: trace_probe->files cleanups Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-16 17:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] tracing/kprobes: Avoid perf_trace_buf_*() if ->perf_events is empty Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-17  3:41   ` zhangwei(Jovi) [this message]
2013-06-17 13:48     ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-17  4:33   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-06-16 17:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] tracing/kprobes: Kill probe_enable_lock Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-17  4:59   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-06-17 15:18     ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-18  2:49       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-06-18  3:41       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-06-18 19:24         ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-19 20:30           ` [PATCH v2 " Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-19 20:34             ` [PATCH] tracing/kprobes: Don't pass addr=ip to perf_trace_buf_submit() Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-20  3:54               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-06-20  3:35             ` [PATCH v2 2/3] tracing/kprobes: Kill probe_enable_lock Masami Hiramatsu
2013-06-16 17:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] tracing/kprobes: Turn trace_probe->files into list_head Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-17  6:20   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-06-17 15:30     ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51BE857A.1080505@huawei.com \
    --to=jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.