From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Lots of confusion on bss refcounting.
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:09:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51BF5ED4.9010704@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371495758.8168.3.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net>
On 06/17/2013 12:02 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 11:49 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>
>> We create an assoc_data, assign a bss pointer in ieee80211_mgd_assoc,
>> but do not claim a reference.
>
> Heh, yeah, I was actually looking at this code too but didn't have time
> today to finish my thoughts ...
>
>> Later, when deleting the assoc_data, the ref is not freed either,
>> except in one error path where it is explicitly freed:
>>
>> if (!ieee80211_assoc_success(sdata, *bss, mgmt, len)) {
>> /* oops -- internal error -- send timeout for now */
>> ieee80211_destroy_assoc_data(sdata, false);
>> cfg80211_put_bss(sdata->local->hw.wiphy, *bss);
>> return RX_MGMT_CFG80211_ASSOC_TIMEOUT;
>> }
>>
>> This seems ripe for bugs, if not already buggy.
>>
>> Maybe we should be more explicit about always grabbing a ref when
>> we take a reference to the pointer, and always put it when we
>> destroy the pointer?
>
> I think the reference is actually given to mac80211 by cfg80211 in
> cfg80211_mlme_assoc(), so we shouldn't need to grab a reference?
> Although I'm certainly willing to change this and make cfg80211 always
> put the reference after calling rdev_assoc() so that the driver/mac80211
> would be responsible for obtaining its own if it needs to hang on to the
> struct.
>
> This does seem broken though.
The bss reference is passed back, and through luck or careful programming,
it *seems* that all paths related to calling ieee80211_rx_mgmt_assoc_resp
managed to consume the bss.
I haven't figured out yet why this is not an erroneous put since I didn't
find the reference taken in the first place.
I'm going to work on making some changes to the ref counting scheme
a bit. I'd rather have the code perhaps take and put a few refs
it might otherwise skip to keep the ownership cleaner and make
the code easier to debug and understand...
I'll post some for RFC when I make some progress.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-17 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-17 18:49 Lots of confusion on bss refcounting Ben Greear
2013-06-17 19:02 ` Johannes Berg
2013-06-17 19:09 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2013-06-17 21:31 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-18 0:30 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-18 12:49 ` Johannes Berg
2013-06-18 15:47 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-18 15:52 ` Johannes Berg
2013-06-18 15:59 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-18 21:36 ` Ben Greear
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51BF5ED4.9010704@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.