From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Changes in the Buildroot autobuilders
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:21:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51BFFC5D.4040600@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130617175407.GA3202@free.fr>
On 17/06/13 19:54, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> On 2013-06-17 11:20 -0500, Spenser Gilliland spake thusly:
>> >Are we sure we want to add more variables to the .mk files. One of
>> >Buildroot's main differentiators is the cleanliness of these files in
>> >comparison to other packaging methods.
+1
At least on the short term, the number of maintainers will be small and
the number of packages per maintainer will be large. Some maintainers
will also be fairly ephemeral - e.g. Maxime added support for systemd a
year ago, but probably by now he doesn't consider himself a maintainer of
it anymore. Also the rules may be a little more complex than based on
package name.
So I think a nice solution would be to add a script in support/scripts
that explicitly encodes all the maintainers - maintainers can add
themselves with patches (just like in the kernel). The a.b.o would fetch
the script once a day just before sending out its daily mails, and call
it with everything it knows about the build failure set in the environment.
>> >
>> >As an alternative, this information could be pulled from the git log
>> >and anyone who has made a change to the package directory in the past
>> >would be subscribed to errors.
> No, I am not in favour of this solution.
>
> Being a 'maintainer' should be voluntary, opt-in, and explicit.
+1 too.
However, Spenser points out in another mail:
> I think many people would like to know if something they did may have
> triggered a bug, not just the maintainer of the package.
I could agree with sending mails automatically to the authors of a
package commit if the commit was done in the last week or so.
Regards,
Arnout
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-18 6:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-16 16:00 [Buildroot] Changes in the Buildroot autobuilders Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-16 17:03 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-06-16 17:18 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-16 17:25 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-06-16 18:05 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-17 7:45 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-06-17 7:49 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-17 16:20 ` Spenser Gilliland
2013-06-17 17:54 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-06-17 18:07 ` ANDY KENNEDY
2013-06-17 20:09 ` Mischa Jonker
2013-06-18 7:12 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-17 20:39 ` Spenser Gilliland
2013-06-18 6:21 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2013-06-18 7:16 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 16:46 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-06-17 6:25 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51BFFC5D.4040600@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.