From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1UpE2v-0003uT-JN for mharc-qemu-trivial@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:47:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48183) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpE2p-0003ml-QO for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:47:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpE2o-0003Vs-P4 for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:47:11 -0400 Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([86.62.121.231]:39647) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpE2m-0003VJ-CA; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:47:08 -0400 Received: from [192.168.88.2] (mjt.vpn.tls.msk.ru [192.168.177.99]) by isrv.corpit.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B8641B1A; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:47:06 +0400 (MSK) Message-ID: <51C17009.4050102@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:47:05 +0400 From: Michael Tokarev Organization: Telecom Service, JSC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Icedove/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Crosthwaite References: <51C16755.9050700@msgid.tls.msk.ru> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 OpenPGP: id=804465C5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 86.62.121.231 Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 1/5] block/nand: Factor out common code X-BeenThere: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:47:16 -0000 19.06.2013 12:13, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: [] > All sounds fair. Ill have another look in the context of type > changing, and factoring out some commonality. Your able to take P2 > without conflict? :) Thanks! And sure, either with or without your next reformatting (block/nand: Formatting sweep) -- either on top of it or without it -- is okay. /mjt From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48164) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpE2n-0003mf-Mi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:47:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpE2m-0003VZ-J6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:47:09 -0400 Message-ID: <51C17009.4050102@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:47:05 +0400 From: Michael Tokarev MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <51C16755.9050700@msgid.tls.msk.ru> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH v1 1/5] block/nand: Factor out common code List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Crosthwaite Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org 19.06.2013 12:13, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: [] > All sounds fair. Ill have another look in the context of type > changing, and factoring out some commonality. Your able to take P2 > without conflict? :) Thanks! And sure, either with or without your next reformatting (block/nand: Formatting sweep) -- either on top of it or without it -- is okay. /mjt