From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@profitbricks.com>
Cc: David Dillow <dillowda@ornl.gov>, Vu Pham <vuhuong@mellanox.com>,
Sebastian Riemer <sebastian.riemer@profitbricks.com>,
linux-rdma <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>,
Roland Dreier <roland@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/14] scsi_transport_srp: Add transport layer error handling
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:27:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C1CDC8.4070103@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51C1B5CA.2030302@profitbricks.com>
On 06/19/13 15:44, Jack Wang wrote:
>> + /*
>> + * It can occur that after fast_io_fail_tmo expired and before
>> + * dev_loss_tmo expired that the SCSI error handler has
>> + * offlined one or more devices. scsi_target_unblock() doesn't
>> + * change the state of these devices into running, so do that
>> + * explicitly.
>> + */
>> + spin_lock_irq(shost->host_lock);
>> + __shost_for_each_device(sdev, shost)
>> + if (sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_OFFLINE)
>> + sdev->sdev_state = SDEV_RUNNING;
>> + spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);
>
> Do you have test case to verify this behaviour?
Hello Jack,
This is what I came up with after analyzing why a so-called "port
flapping" test failed. The concept of that test is simple: use
ibportstate to disable and reenable the proper IB port on the switch
with random intervals and check whether I/O starts running again if the
path remains operational long enough. When running such a test for a few
days with random intervals between a few seconds and a few minutes
sooner or later it will occur that scsi_try_host_reset() succeeds and
that scsi_eh_test_devices() fails. That will cause the SCSI error
handler to offline devices. Hence the above code to change the offline
state into running after a reconnect succeeds. I'm not proud of that
code but I couldn't find a better solution. Maybe the above code won't
be necessary anymore once we switch to Hannes' new SCSI error handler.
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-19 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-19 13:44 [PATCH 07/14] scsi_transport_srp: Add transport layer error handling Jack Wang
2013-06-19 15:27 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2013-06-21 12:17 ` Jack Wang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-06-24 13:48 Jack Wang
[not found] ` <51C84E39.80806-EIkl63zCoXaH+58JC4qpiA@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-24 15:50 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <51C86AB4.1000906-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-24 16:05 ` Jack Wang
2013-06-12 13:17 [PATCH 0/14] IB SRP initiator patches for kernel 3.11 Bart Van Assche
2013-06-12 13:28 ` [PATCH 07/14] scsi_transport_srp: Add transport layer error handling Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <51B8777B.5050201-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-13 19:43 ` Vu Pham
2013-06-14 13:19 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <51BB1857.7040802-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-14 17:59 ` Vu Pham
[not found] ` <51BB5A04.3080901-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-15 9:52 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <51BC3945.9030900-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-17 6:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-06-17 7:04 ` Bart Van Assche
2013-06-17 7:14 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-06-17 7:29 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <51BEBAEA.4080202-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-17 8:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-06-17 10:13 ` Sebastian Riemer
2013-06-18 16:59 ` Vu Pham
[not found] ` <51C09202.2040503-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-19 13:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2013-06-23 21:13 ` Mike Christie
[not found] ` <51C764FB.6070207-hcNo3dDEHLuVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-24 7:37 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C1CDC8.4070103@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=dillowda@ornl.gov \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=jinpu.wang@profitbricks.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.riemer@profitbricks.com \
--cc=vuhuong@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.