All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mips: delete __cpuinit/__CPUINIT usage from MIPS code
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:19:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C22E75.3020001@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371566339-18336-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>

On 06/18/2013 07:38 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
> some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
> do not offset the cost and complications.  For example, the fix in
> commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
> is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
> with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
>
> After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
> the way of devinit and be phased out.  Once all the users are gone,
> we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
>
> Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
> notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
> and are flagged as __cpuinit  -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
> the arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
> As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
> related content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get
> rid of these warnings.  In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
>
> Here, we remove all the MIPS __cpuinit from C code and __CPUINIT
> from asm files.  MIPS is interesting in this respect, because there
> are also uasm users hiding behind their own renamed versions of the
> __cpuinit macros.
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>

I get:


WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x18640): Section mismatch in reference from 
the function register_cavium_notifier() to the variable 
.cpuinit.data:octeon_cpu_callback_nb.37045
The function register_cavium_notifier() references
the variable __cpuinitdata octeon_cpu_callback_nb.37045.
This is often because register_cavium_notifier lacks a __cpuinitdata
annotation or the annotation of octeon_cpu_callback_nb.37045 is wrong.

WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x18650): Section mismatch in reference from 
the function register_cavium_notifier() to the variable 
.cpuinit.data:octeon_cpu_callback_nb.37045
The function register_cavium_notifier() references
the variable __cpuinitdata octeon_cpu_callback_nb.37045.
This is often because register_cavium_notifier lacks a __cpuinitdata
annotation or the annotation of octeon_cpu_callback_nb.37045 is wrong.

WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x24778): Section mismatch in reference from 
the function start_secondary() to the function 
.cpuinit.text:calibrate_delay()
The function start_secondary() references
the function __cpuinit calibrate_delay().
This is often because start_secondary lacks a __cpuinit
annotation or the annotation of calibrate_delay is wrong.

WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x247b4): Section mismatch in reference from 
the function start_secondary() to the function 
.cpuinit.text:notify_cpu_starting()
The function start_secondary() references
the function __cpuinit notify_cpu_starting().
This is often because start_secondary lacks a __cpuinit
annotation or the annotation of notify_cpu_starting is wrong.



So I think an alternate approach is required.

Really I think we need to leave all existing __cpuinitdata and __cpuinit 
annotations in place.

Instead we would first change the definitions of these two to be empyt:

#define __cpuinit
#define __cpuinitdata

Once that is working, we would make a second pass and remove the symbols 
themselves.

David Daney

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-19 22:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-18 14:38 [PATCH v2] mips: delete __cpuinit/__CPUINIT usage from MIPS code Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-18 14:38 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-18 14:54 ` Ralf Baechle
2013-06-19 22:19 ` David Daney [this message]
2013-06-20  0:28   ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-20  0:28     ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-20  2:15     ` Ralf Baechle
2013-06-20 13:38       ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-20 13:38         ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-20 13:55         ` Ralf Baechle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51C22E75.3020001@gmail.com \
    --to=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.