From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
To: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, fubar@us.ibm.com, andy@greyhouse.net,
davem@davemloft.net, linux@8192.net, nicolas.2p.debian@free.fr,
rick.jones2@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/6] bonding: add an option to fail when any of arp_ip_target is inaccessible
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:29:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C230D2.5070405@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130619222459.GB10910@redhat.com>
On 20/06/13 00:24, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:58:52PM +0200, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>> On 19/06/13 19:34, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
<snip>
> Great catch! It gets even more interesting when we try to delete an IP
> target - cause we don't shift the slave's target_last_arp_rx. Will try to
> address that nicely.
>
> And wrt the case of no arp IP targets - we shouldn't get there in the first
> place, actually, cause the whole slave_last_rx() depends on arp_validate,
> which depends on arp_interval and at least one arp_ip_target. However, I
> see that we can do that by removing them one by one via sysfs.
>
> And, btw, we set the target_last_arp_rx in bond_enslave(), the same way as
> last_arp_rx :).
>
Yes, but it is set only if there're targets already present that's why I
said after enslaving. In the case of later target addition
target_last_arp_rx[0] will be 0 and last_arp_rx will be set.
Cheers,
Nik
> Awesome ideas, thank you!
>
>>> + }
>>>
>>> return slave->dev->last_rx;
>>> }
>>> @@ -486,6 +511,7 @@ extern const struct bond_parm_tbl bond_lacp_tbl[];
>>> extern const struct bond_parm_tbl bond_mode_tbl[];
>>> extern const struct bond_parm_tbl xmit_hashtype_tbl[];
>>> extern const struct bond_parm_tbl arp_validate_tbl[];
>>> +extern const struct bond_parm_tbl arp_all_targets_tbl[];
>>> extern const struct bond_parm_tbl fail_over_mac_tbl[];
>>> extern const struct bond_parm_tbl pri_reselect_tbl[];
>>> extern struct bond_parm_tbl ad_select_tbl[];
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-19 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-19 17:34 [PATCH net-next 6/6] bonding: add an option to fail when any of arp_ip_target is inaccessible Veaceslav Falico
2013-06-19 21:58 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2013-06-19 22:24 ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-06-19 22:29 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov [this message]
2013-06-20 18:44 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C230D2.5070405@redhat.com \
--to=nikolay@redhat.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux@8192.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.2p.debian@free.fr \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=vfalico@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.