All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: timer: looping issue, need reset variable 'found'
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 16:26:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C2BCB3.4060603@asianux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1306200944530.4013@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>

On 06/20/2013 03:47 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Chen Gang wrote:
>> > On 06/10/2013 10:12 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> > I think we can treat original implementation as for speed optimization,
>> > so our discussion is "whether this speed optimization has effect with
>> > correctness".
> Then I recommend that you to sit down and analyze the correctness of
> the code.

That is only your recommend, not mean I have duty to.

> 
> Come back when you have a proof of the code being wrong. And by proof
> I mean factual proof not just handwaving theories.


At least before say so, please reply:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If we assume "If there is nothing in tv2 which might come before the
found timer, then any timer in tv3 will ..." is correct.

When we found a timer in 'tv1', we will not search all timers in 'tv2'
(we only search first looping of tv2 for the specific 'slot').

Is it still OK ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


If you do not want to discuss with others, better quite politely, not
need judging or checking others, it is useless for the cooperation with
each other, is it right ?  ;-)


Thanks.
-- 
Chen Gang

Asianux Corporation

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-20  8:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-09 15:49 [PATCH] kernel: timer: looping issue, need reset variable 'found' Chen Gang
2013-06-10 14:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-06-13  3:39   ` Chen Gang
2013-06-18  3:28     ` Chen Gang
2013-06-18 10:42   ` Chen Gang
2013-06-20  7:47     ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-06-20  8:26       ` Chen Gang [this message]
2013-06-20  9:13         ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-06-20 10:20           ` Chen Gang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51C2BCB3.4060603@asianux.com \
    --to=gang.chen@asianux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.