From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mario Smarduch Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] armv7 initial device passthrough support Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 08:58:02 +0200 Message-ID: <51C93F7A.5060703@huawei.com> References: <51B9E319.6000703@huawei.com> <51BC8CAE.8090906@redhat.com> <51C7FE68.1050202@huawei.com> <20130624200154.GD51516@lvm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Christoffer Dall , Paolo Bonzini , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "" , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" To: Stuart Yoder Return-path: Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com ([194.213.3.17]:4140 "EHLO lhrrgout.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751266Ab3FYG6N (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jun 2013 02:58:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 6/25/2013 12:27 AM, Stuart Yoder wrote: >> >> We should avoid creating an environment with important functionality >> outside of the main tree, if at all possible. > > Also, as we architect that generic infrastructure we need to keep in mind that > there are important use cases for doing I/O in user space that are not > KVM guests-- just normal applications that need direct device > access. Yes that's a good point especially data plane NE, also LTE has these use cases at the radio side. > > Stuart >