All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: DuanZhenzhong <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Feng Jin <joe.jin@oracle.com>,
	Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@oracle.com>,
	Chien Yen <chien.yen@oracle.com>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.1] x86: fix emuirq regression from XSA-21 fix
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 15:44:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C94A4A.8050904@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51C9611802000078000E0336@nat28.tlf.novell.com>

Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 25.06.13 at 07:33, DuanZhenzhong <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>         
>> Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>     
>>> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Could you have a look if there is something wrong in xen side of clearing 
>>>> the mapping?
>>>>         
>>> What I am saying is that the error you are getting:
>>>
>>> pt_msix_disable: Unbind msix with pirq 67, gvec 0
>>> pt_msix_disable: Unmap msix with pirq 67
>>> pt_msix_disable: Error: Unmapping of MSI-X failed. [00:04.0]
>>>
>>> cannot be caused by domain_pirq_to_emuirq(d, pirq) returning
>>> IRQ_UNBOUND.
>>> So, why are you getting this error? What is failing?
>>> I am ready to believe the problem is in Xen but Without understanding
>>> why you are getting the error it's hard to find a solution.
>>>   
>>>       
>> I found the reason, you are looking at xen-unstable, I was working with 
>> 4.1.30-OVM, it has patch of CVE-2012-4536 / XSA-21.
>> That patch set ret to -EINVAL initially. After remove that line, unmap 
>> succeed.
>>     
>
> Removing that line certainly isn't right. The proper fix is the one
> below/attached.
>
> Jan
>
> ****************************************************
> x86: fix emuirq regression from XSA-21 fix
>
> The XSA-21 patch broke the assumption of "ret" being zero prior to the
> IRQ_UNBOUND check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c
> @@ -243,6 +243,8 @@ static int physdev_unmap_pirq(struct phy
>          spin_lock(&d->event_lock);
>          if ( domain_pirq_to_emuirq(d, unmap->pirq) != IRQ_UNBOUND )
>              ret = unmap_domain_pirq_emuirq(d, unmap->pirq);
> +        else
> +            ret = 0;
>          spin_unlock(&d->event_lock);
>          if ( unmap->domid == DOMID_SELF || ret )
>              goto free_domain;
>
>
>
>   
Any reason of not right? below patch does work as ret is already zero if it could get to that line.

zduan

****************************************************
x86: fix emuirq regression from XSA-21 fix

The XSA-21 patch broke the assumption of "ret" being zero prior to the
IRQ_UNBOUND check.

Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com>

--- a/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c
@@ -240,7 +240,6 @@ static int physdev_unmap_pirq(struct phy
     if ( ret )
         return ret;
 
-    ret = -EINVAL;
     if ( unmap->pirq < 0 || unmap->pirq >= d->nr_pirqs )
         goto free_domain;

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-25  7:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-08  8:18 [PATCH] xen: reuse the same pirq allocated when driver load first time Zhenzhong Duan
2013-05-10 18:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-13  7:44   ` Zhenzhong Duan
2013-05-13 11:06   ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-13 14:07     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-13 14:50       ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-13 16:17         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-13 17:24           ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-13 18:20             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-14 13:49               ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-14 14:20                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-15  9:41                   ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-15 14:18                     ` Zhenzhong Duan
2013-05-17  2:22                     ` Zhenzhong Duan
2013-05-20 10:24                       ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-20 15:24                         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-20 17:57                         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-20 20:38                           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-21 10:07                             ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2013-05-21 13:40                               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-21 16:51                                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-21 20:42                                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-21 21:50                                     ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-21 22:41                                       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-22  9:37                                         ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-22 15:14                                           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-22 15:25                                             ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-22 16:41                                               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-23  6:31                                                 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-29 17:50                                   ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-30 17:48                                     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-05  5:27                                     ` Zhenzhong Duan
2013-06-05 12:50                                       ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-20  2:57                                         ` Zhenzhong Duan
2013-06-20 14:21                                           ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-24  7:19                                             ` Zhenzhong Duan
2013-06-24  7:19                                               ` Zhenzhong Duan
2013-06-24 17:18                                               ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-25  5:33                                                 ` DuanZhenzhong
2013-06-25  5:33                                                   ` DuanZhenzhong
2013-06-25  7:21                                                   ` [PATCH 4.1] x86: fix emuirq regression from XSA-21 fix (was: Re: [PATCH] xen: reuse the same pirq allocated when driver load first time) Jan Beulich
2013-06-25  7:44                                                     ` DuanZhenzhong [this message]
2013-06-25  8:36                                                       ` [PATCH 4.1] x86: fix emuirq regression from XSA-21 fix Jan Beulich
2013-06-25  8:43                                                         ` DuanZhenzhong
2013-06-25 10:56                                                     ` [PATCH 4.1] x86: fix emuirq regression from XSA-21 fix (was: Re: [PATCH] xen: reuse the same pirq allocated when driver load first time) Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-25 11:03                                                       ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-27  8:34                                                         ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-27 10:46                                                           ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-25 17:51                                                   ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: reuse the same pirq allocated when driver load first time Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-26  4:00                                                     ` Zhenzhong Duan
2013-06-26  4:00                                                       ` Zhenzhong Duan
2013-06-26 18:08                                                       ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-27  4:01                                                         ` Zhenzhong Duan
2013-06-27  4:01                                                           ` Zhenzhong Duan
2013-06-27 11:52                                                           ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-28  2:33                                                             ` Zhenzhong Duan
2013-06-28  2:33                                                               ` Zhenzhong Duan
2013-06-28 11:12                                                               ` Stefano Stabellini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51C94A4A.8050904@oracle.com \
    --to=zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=chien.yen@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=joe.jin@oracle.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    --cc=yuval.shaia@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.