From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix more issues with generic pinconf bindings
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:16:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C99823.1060503@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201306251455.01540.heiko@sntech.de>
On 25/06/13 13:55, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> As Stephen Warren pointed out, some pinconf bindings had deficits
> either in documentation or in the whole thought process.
>
> Therefore this series tries to fix these issues by improving
> documentation and removing the real controversial bindings for now.
>
> Of the changed pinconf bindings only the slew-rate had an acutal
> current user (since yesterday). James I hope it's ok to simply
> remove the slew-rate handling from the tz1090 driver until we can
> handle it correctly in dt.
Other than my comment about patch 3 (which since it's the only case I
don't mind too much, it can easily be added back again in the future):
Reviewed-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cheers
James
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix more issues with generic pinconf bindings
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:16:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C99823.1060503@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201306251455.01540.heiko@sntech.de>
On 25/06/13 13:55, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> As Stephen Warren pointed out, some pinconf bindings had deficits
> either in documentation or in the whole thought process.
>
> Therefore this series tries to fix these issues by improving
> documentation and removing the real controversial bindings for now.
>
> Of the changed pinconf bindings only the slew-rate had an acutal
> current user (since yesterday). James I hope it's ok to simply
> remove the slew-rate handling from the tz1090 driver until we can
> handle it correctly in dt.
Other than my comment about patch 3 (which since it's the only case I
don't mind too much, it can easily be added back again in the future):
Reviewed-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cheers
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-25 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-25 12:55 [PATCH 0/4] Fix more issues with generic pinconf bindings Heiko Stübner
2013-06-25 12:55 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-25 12:55 ` [PATCH 1/4] pinctrl: more clarifications for generic pull configs Heiko Stübner
2013-06-25 13:14 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-25 12:56 ` [PATCH 2/4] pinctrl: set unit for debounce time pinconfig to usec Heiko Stübner
2013-06-25 13:15 ` Linus Walleij
[not found] ` <201306251455.01540.heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-25 12:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: remove slew-rate parameter from tz1090 Heiko Stübner
2013-06-25 12:56 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-25 13:05 ` James Hogan
2013-06-25 13:05 ` James Hogan
2013-06-25 13:21 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-25 13:27 ` James Hogan
2013-06-25 13:27 ` James Hogan
2013-06-25 13:32 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-25 13:50 ` James Hogan
2013-06-25 15:39 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-25 21:40 ` Stephen Warren
2013-06-25 13:22 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-25 14:57 ` James Hogan
2013-06-25 21:46 ` Stephen Warren
2013-06-27 8:32 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-25 12:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] pinctrl: remove bindings for pinconf options needing more thought Heiko Stübner
2013-06-25 13:34 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-25 13:16 ` James Hogan [this message]
2013-06-25 13:16 ` [PATCH 0/4] Fix more issues with generic pinconf bindings James Hogan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C99823.1060503@imgtec.com \
--to=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.