From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Hogan Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix more issues with generic pinconf bindings Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:16:19 +0100 Message-ID: <51C99823.1060503@imgtec.com> References: <201306251455.01540.heiko@sntech.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201306251455.01540.heiko@sntech.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: =?UTF-8?B?SGVpa28gU3TDvGJuZXI=?= Cc: Linus Walleij , Stephen Warren , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Grant Likely , Rob Herring List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 25/06/13 13:55, Heiko St=C3=BCbner wrote: > As Stephen Warren pointed out, some pinconf bindings had deficits > either in documentation or in the whole thought process. >=20 > Therefore this series tries to fix these issues by improving > documentation and removing the real controversial bindings for now. >=20 > Of the changed pinconf bindings only the slew-rate had an acutal > current user (since yesterday). James I hope it's ok to simply > remove the slew-rate handling from the tz1090 driver until we can > handle it correctly in dt. Other than my comment about patch 3 (which since it's the only case I don't mind too much, it can easily be added back again in the future): Reviewed-by: James Hogan Cheers James From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751595Ab3FYNRh (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:17:37 -0400 Received: from multi.imgtec.com ([194.200.65.239]:25467 "EHLO multi.imgtec.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751211Ab3FYNRg (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:17:36 -0400 Message-ID: <51C99823.1060503@imgtec.com> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:16:19 +0100 From: James Hogan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?SGVpa28gU3TDvGJuZXI=?= CC: Linus Walleij , Stephen Warren , , , Grant Likely , Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix more issues with generic pinconf bindings References: <201306251455.01540.heiko@sntech.de> In-Reply-To: <201306251455.01540.heiko@sntech.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [192.168.154.65] X-SEF-Processed: 7_3_0_01192__2013_06_25_14_17_35 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 25/06/13 13:55, Heiko Stübner wrote: > As Stephen Warren pointed out, some pinconf bindings had deficits > either in documentation or in the whole thought process. > > Therefore this series tries to fix these issues by improving > documentation and removing the real controversial bindings for now. > > Of the changed pinconf bindings only the slew-rate had an acutal > current user (since yesterday). James I hope it's ok to simply > remove the slew-rate handling from the tz1090 driver until we can > handle it correctly in dt. Other than my comment about patch 3 (which since it's the only case I don't mind too much, it can easily be added back again in the future): Reviewed-by: James Hogan Cheers James