From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Keir (Xen.org)" <keir@xen.org>, Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] AMD/intremap: Prevent use of per-device vector maps until irq logic is fixed
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 06:20:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51CC1FF5.1060906@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51CC185C02000078000E1116@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 6/27/2013 3:47 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 27.06.13 at 01:28, Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
> wrote:
>> On 6/26/2013 4:54 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 04/06/13 17:38, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>>> XSA-36 changed the default vector map mode from global to per-device. This is
>>>> because a global vector map does not prevent one PCI device from
>> impersonating
>>>> another and launching a DoS on the system.
>>>>
>>>> However, the per-device vector map logic is broken for devices with multiple
>>>> MSI-X vectors, which can either result in a failed ASSERT() or misprogramming
>>>> of a guests interrupt remapping tables. The core problem is not trivial to
>>>> fix.
>>>>
>>>> In an effort to get AMD systems back to a non-regressed state, introduce a
>> new
>>>> type of vector map called per-device-global. This uses per-device vector maps
>>>> in the IOMMU, but uses a single used_vector map for the core IRQ logic.
>>>>
>>>> This patch is intended to be removed as soon as the per-device logic is fixed
>>>> correctly.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
>>> Can we get a decision on this? The 4.3 is looming and multi MSI-X PCI
>>> functions are *still* broken on AMD systems, in all stable versions of
>>> Xen, regressed by XSA-36.
>>>
>>> From my understanding of the points so far, we have agreed that this
>>> patch is suitable for 4.3 and previous, with Jan's multi-MSI series
>>> being the correct solution going forwards into 4.4.
>> Since the feedback suggesting that cleaning up is probably not
>> necessary, the only thing is probably the use of the word "BUG". Could
>> it be replaced with "Workaround" instead?
> I'd just drop the "BUG:". And I can certainly do so while applying.
> So in cases where you want something trivial changed, you could
> simply give an ack saying under what conditions that ack applies.
>
> Jan
Acked with removing the word "BUG" as suggested by Jan.
Suravee
>
>>> The only query at the moment is for the exact wording, which has had no
>>> attention for a week.
>>>
>>> ~Andrew
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes since v2:
>>>> * Do not override command line.
>>>> * reuse OPT_IRQ_VECTOR_MAP_GLOBAL.
>>>>
>>>> Changes since v1:
>>>> * Correct stupid mistake in commit message, making it confusing to read
>>>>
>>>> diff -r 2d37d2d652a8 -r a017d74f346d
>> xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/pci_amd_iommu.c
>>>> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/pci_amd_iommu.c
>>>> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/pci_amd_iommu.c
>>>> @@ -223,8 +223,19 @@ int __init amd_iov_detect(void)
>>>> {
>>>> if ( amd_iommu_perdev_intremap )
>>>> {
>>>> - printk("AMD-Vi: Enabling per-device vector maps\n");
>>>> - opt_irq_vector_map = OPT_IRQ_VECTOR_MAP_PERDEV;
>>>> + /* Per-device vector map logic is broken for devices with
>> multiple
>>>> + * MSI-X interrupts (and would also be for multiple MSI, if Xen
>>>> + * supported it).
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Until this is fixed, use global vector tables as far as the
>> irq
>>>> + * logic is concerned to avoid the buggy behaviour of per-device
>>>> + * maps in map_domain_pirq(), and use per-device tables as far
>> as
>>>> + * intremap code is concerned to avoid the security issue.
>>>> + */
>>>> + printk(XENLOG_WARNING "AMD-Vi BUG: per-device vector map logic is
>> broken. "
>>>> + "Using per-device-global maps instead until a fix is
>> found\n");
>>>> +
>>>> + opt_irq_vector_map = OPT_IRQ_VECTOR_MAP_GLOBAL;
>>>> }
>>>> else
>>>> {
>>>> @@ -235,6 +246,12 @@ int __init amd_iov_detect(void)
>>>> else
>>>> {
>>>> printk("AMD-Vi: Not overriding irq_vector_map setting\n");
>>>> +
>>>> + if ( opt_irq_vector_map != OPT_IRQ_VECTOR_MAP_GLOBAL )
>>>> + {
>>>> + printk(XENLOG_WARNING "AMD-Vi BUG: per-device vector map logic is
>> broken. "
>>>> + "Use irq_vector_map=global to work around.");
>>>> + }
>>>> }
>>>> if ( !amd_iommu_perdev_intremap )
>>>> printk(XENLOG_WARNING "AMD-Vi: Using global interrupt remap table
>> is not recommended (see XSA-36)!\n");
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>>> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
>>>> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-27 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-04 16:38 [PATCH v3] AMD/intremap: Prevent use of per-device vector maps until irq logic is fixed Andrew Cooper
2013-06-10 12:25 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-14 8:45 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-15 1:13 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-06-17 8:19 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-17 8:55 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-17 9:00 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-17 10:01 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-06-26 9:54 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-06-26 23:28 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-06-27 8:47 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-27 9:13 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-06-27 11:20 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51CC1FF5.1060906@amd.com \
--to=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=jacob.shin@amd.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.