From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?VG9yYWxmIEbDtnJzdGVy?= Subject: Re: 3.10-rcX: cpu governor ondemand doesn't scale well after s2ram Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 19:17:12 +0200 Message-ID: <51CDC518.8030907@gmx.de> References: <51C08370.4050906@gmx.de> <1778593.ufLkNuJuaY@vostro.rjw.lan> <51CB34A2.7090404@gmx.de> <1475885.FjB577tJj8@vostro.rjw.lan> <51CC7DB2.3020502@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: Viresh Kumar Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, Linux PM list On 06/28/2013 05:44 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Can you give dumps of complete cpufreq directories for all cpus befor= e > and after s2r. That may give us some hint about the problem. Because CPU0 is not affected I somehow arguing about nohz patches ... --=20 MfG/Sincerely Toralf F=C3=B6rster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?VG9yYWxmIEbDtnJzdGVy?= Subject: Re: 3.10-rcX: cpu governor ondemand doesn't scale well after s2ram Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 19:17:12 +0200 Message-ID: <51CDC518.8030907@gmx.de> References: <51C08370.4050906@gmx.de> <1778593.ufLkNuJuaY@vostro.rjw.lan> <51CB34A2.7090404@gmx.de> <1475885.FjB577tJj8@vostro.rjw.lan> <51CC7DB2.3020502@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:64913 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755398Ab3F1RRQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:17:16 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.30]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LfUkZ-1UU47G0kOn-00p8za for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 19:17:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, Linux PM list On 06/28/2013 05:44 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Can you give dumps of complete cpufreq directories for all cpus befor= e > and after s2r. That may give us some hint about the problem. Because CPU0 is not affected I somehow arguing about nohz patches ... --=20 MfG/Sincerely Toralf F=C3=B6rster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3