From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?VG9yYWxmIEbDtnJzdGVy?= Subject: Re: 3.10-rcX: cpu governor ondemand doesn't scale well after s2ram Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 20:51:11 +0200 Message-ID: <51CDDB1F.3080306@gmx.de> References: <51C08370.4050906@gmx.de> <51CDC518.8030907@gmx.de> <1875598.7eDhd0iuMQ@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1875598.7eDhd0iuMQ@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Viresh Kumar , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, Linux PM list On 06/28/2013 08:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, June 28, 2013 07:17:12 PM Toralf F=C3=B6rster wrote: >> On 06/28/2013 05:44 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >>> Can you give dumps of complete cpufreq directories for all cpus bef= ore >>> and after s2r. That may give us some hint about the problem. >> >> Because CPU0 is not affected I somehow arguing about nohz patches ..= =2E >=20 > Do you have CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL set by chance? >=20 > Rafael >=20 >=20 no $ zgrep CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL /proc/config.gz I do just have : $ zgrep CONFIG_NO_HZ /proc/config.gz CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON=3Dy CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE=3Dy CONFIG_NO_HZ=3Dy --=20 MfG/Sincerely Toralf F=C3=B6rster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3