From: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
To: <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] bitbake.conf: Add SECURITY_*FLAGS overridable definition
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:28:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51CDE3D7.5060908@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372447427-31750-1-git-send-email-sgw@linux.intel.com>
On 6/28/13 2:23 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
> This will allow for SECURITY_CFLAGS and SECURITY_LDFLAGS to be
> defined in the security_flags.inc and override the empty default.
>
> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> index 62a3936..72e1a78 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> +++ b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> @@ -493,7 +493,8 @@ export TARGET_CPPFLAGS = ""
>
> export BUILD_CFLAGS = "${BUILD_CPPFLAGS} ${BUILD_OPTIMIZATION}"
> BUILDSDK_CFLAGS = "${BUILDSDK_CPPFLAGS} ${BUILD_OPTIMIZATION}"
> -export CFLAGS = "${TARGET_CFLAGS}"
> +SECURITY_CFLAGS ?= ""
> +export CFLAGS = "${TARGET_CFLAGS} ${SECURITY_CFLAGS}"
> export TARGET_CFLAGS = "${TARGET_CPPFLAGS} ${SELECTED_OPTIMIZATION}"
I would prefer if the cflags came in via the TARGET_CFLAGS, similar to how the
selected_optimization works. In the past we've hacked around with CFLAGS itself
and in the end it's always seem to have caused problems. By modifing
TARGET_CFLAGS instead, then the user can do (in a recipe):
CFLAGS = "-fmy-custom-flag ${TARGET_CFLAGS}"
> export BUILD_CXXFLAGS = "${BUILD_CFLAGS} -fpermissive"
> @@ -523,7 +524,8 @@ LINKER_HASH_STYLE_mips64 = "sysv"
> LINKER_HASH_STYLE_mips64el = "sysv"
> TARGET_LINK_HASH_STYLE ?= "${@['-Wl,--hash-style=gnu',''][d.getVar('LINKER_HASH_STYLE', True) != 'gnu']}"
>
> -export LDFLAGS = "${TARGET_LDFLAGS}"
> +SECURITY_LDFLAGS ?= ""
> +export LDFLAGS = "${TARGET_LDFLAGS} ${SECURITY_LDFLAGS}"
Same comment here.
> export TARGET_LDFLAGS = "-Wl,-O1 ${TARGET_LINK_HASH_STYLE}"
> #export TARGET_LDFLAGS = "-L${STAGING_DIR_TARGET}${libdir} \
> # -Wl,-rpath-link,${STAGING_DIR_TARGET}${libdir} \
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-28 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-28 19:23 [PATCH 1/2 v2] bitbake.conf: Add SECURITY_*FLAGS overridable definition Saul Wold
2013-06-28 19:23 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] security_flags: Add the compiler and linker flags that enhance security Saul Wold
2013-06-28 22:11 ` Khem Raj
2013-06-28 19:28 ` Mark Hatle [this message]
2013-06-28 22:13 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] bitbake.conf: Add SECURITY_*FLAGS overridable definition Khem Raj
2013-06-28 19:51 ` Phil Blundell
2013-06-28 20:19 ` Saul Wold
2013-06-28 21:04 ` Richard Purdie
2013-06-28 21:07 ` Phil Blundell
2013-06-28 21:52 ` Saul Wold
2013-06-28 22:17 ` Khem Raj
2013-06-28 22:16 ` Khem Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51CDE3D7.5060908@windriver.com \
--to=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.