From: Dash Four <mr.dash.four@googlemail.com>
To: Jeff Haran <Jeff.Haran@citrix.com>
Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Netfilter Core Team <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] ipset: add "inner" flag implementation
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 21:27:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51CDF1A7.1060602@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E5779AD88B2F040B8A7E83ECF544D1A01AD5B@SJCPEX01CL02.citrite.net>
Jeff Haran wrote:
> I suppose as an alternative you could go way against the usual practice and put some text in a function header comment block indicating what the return code means. I know it doesn't get used much but C has had this /* comment */ thing for a long time. I've never understood why more people don't use it.
>
All true. I guess I could go the full hog and document the entire
function, then use "return false" as Jozsef suggested, but this will
stick out as a sore thumb as it will be the only function documented in
the entire module.
Jozsef, I don't mind doing either of the suggested alternatives: keep
"goto err" or document the entire function and use "return false" - let
me know what your preference is.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-28 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1371423775.git.mr.dash.four@googlemail.com>
2013-06-16 23:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] iptables: bugfix: prevent wrong syntax being accepted by the set match Dash Four
2013-06-16 23:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] ipset: add "inner" flag implementation Dash Four
2013-06-26 20:27 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2013-06-27 22:36 ` Dash Four
2013-06-27 22:45 ` Jeff Haran
2013-06-28 20:27 ` Dash Four [this message]
2013-06-29 11:10 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2013-07-01 17:06 ` Jeff Haran
2013-06-29 11:07 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2013-06-29 14:05 ` Dash Four
2013-06-29 18:13 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2013-06-16 23:27 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ipset: add set match "inner" flag support Dash Four
2013-06-16 23:27 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] iptables: " Dash Four
2013-06-16 23:27 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] iptables (userspace): " Dash Four
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51CDF1A7.1060602@googlemail.com \
--to=mr.dash.four@googlemail.com \
--cc=Jeff.Haran@citrix.com \
--cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.